Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26232118›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2015

Genome wide comprehensive analysis and web resource development on cell wall degrading enzymes from phyto-parasitic nematodes.

Krishan Mohan Rai, Vimal Kumar Balasubramanian, Cassie Marie Welker, Mingxiong Pang, Mei Mei Hii, Venugopal Mendu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pathogenicity ofHelminthologia · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Krishan Mohan RaiDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. krishan.m.rai@ttu.edu.
Vimal Kumar BalasubramanianDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. vimal-kumar.balasubramanian@ttu.edu.
Cassie Marie WelkerDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. cassie.welker@ttu.edu.
Mingxiong PangDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. mingxiong.pang@ttu.edu.
Mei Mei HiiDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. meimei@sbc.org.my.
Venugopal MenduDepartment of Plant & Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2802, 15th street, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. venugopal.mendu@ttu.edu.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe plant cell wall serves as a primary barrier against pathogen invasion. The success of a plant pathogen largely depends on its ability to overcome this barrier. During the infection process, plant parasitic nematodes secrete cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) apart from piercing with their stylet, a sharp and hard mouthpart used for successful infection. CWDEs typically consist of cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases, which help the nematode to infect and establish the feeding structure or form a cyst. The study of nematode cell wall degrading enzymes not only enhance our understanding of the interaction between nematodes and their host, but also provides information on a novel source of enzymes for their potential use in biomass based biofuel/bioproduct industries. Although there is comprehensive information available on genome wide analysis of CWDEs for bacteria, fungi, termites and plants, but no comprehensive information available for plant pathogenic nematodes. Herein we have performed a genome wide analysis of CWDEs from the genome sequenced phyto pathogenic nematode species and developed a comprehensive publicly available database.

resultsIn the present study, we have performed a genome wide analysis for the presence of CWDEs from five plant parasitic nematode species with fully sequenced genomes covering three genera viz. Bursaphelenchus, Glorodera and Meloidogyne. Using the Hidden Markov Models (HMM) conserved domain profiles of the respective gene families, we have identified 530 genes encoding CWDEs that are distributed among 24 gene families of glycoside hydrolases (412) and polysaccharide lyases (118). Furthermore, expression profiles of these genes were analyzed across the life cycle of a potato cyst nematode. Most genes were found to have moderate to high expression from early to late infectious stages, while some clusters were invasion stage specific, indicating the role of these enzymes in the nematode's infection and establishment process. Additionally, we have also developed a Nematode's Plant Cell Wall Degrading Enzyme (NCWDE) database as a platform to provide a comprehensive outcome of the present study.

conclusionsOur study provides collective information about different families of CWDEs from five different sequenced plant pathogenic nematode species. The outcomes of this study will help in developing better strategies to curtail the nematode infection, as well as help in identification of novel cell wall degrading enzymes for biofuel/bioproduct industries.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsCell WallGlycoside HydrolasesHelminth ProteinsPlant CellsPolysaccharide-LyasesTylenchidaGlycoside HydrolasesHelminth ProteinsPolysaccharide-Lyases

Identifiers

PMID26232118
PMCPMC4521475
OpenAlexW1751698766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.