ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2015
Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Back to the future 2: the implications of germplasm structure on the balance between short- and long-term genetic gain in a changing target population of environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of plant breeding using genomic information.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Unraveling the potential of phenomic selection within and among diverse breeding material of maize (Zea mays L.).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Use of F2 Bulks in Training Sets for Genomic Prediction of Combining Ability and Hybrid Performance.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Across-years prediction of hybrid performance in maize using genomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageDeterministic formulas accurately forecast the decline in predictive ability of genomic prediction with changing testers, target environments or traits and truncation selection. Genomic prediction of testcross performance (TP) was found to be a promising selection tool in hybrid breeding as long as the same tester and environments are used in the training and prediction set. In practice, however, selection targets often change in terms of testers, target environments or traits leading to a reduced predictive ability. Hence, it would be desirable to estimate for given training data the expected decline in the predictive ability of genomic prediction under such settings by deterministic formulas that require only quantitative genetic parameters available from the breeding program. Here, we derived formulas for forecasting the predictive ability under different selection targets in the training and prediction set and applied these to predict the TP of lines based on line per se or testcross evaluations. On the basis of two experiments with maize, we validated our approach in four scenarios characterized by different selection targets. Forecasted and empirically observed predictive abilities obtained by cross-validation generally agreed well, with deviations between -0.06 and 0.01 only. Applying the prediction model to a different tester and/or year reduced the predictive ability by not more than 18%. Accounting additionally for truncation selection in our formulas indicated a substantial reduction in predictive ability in the prediction set, amounting, e.g., to 53% for a selected fraction α = 10%. In conclusion, our deterministic formulas enable forecasting the predictive abilities of new selection targets with sufficient precision and could be used to calculate parameters required for optimizing the allocation of resources in multi-stage genomic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26231985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.