Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231985›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2015

Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Pascal Schopp, Christian Riedelsheimer, H Friedrich Utz, Chris-Carolin Schön, Albrecht E Melchinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Across-years prediction of hybrid performance in maize using genomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pascal SchoppDepartment of Applied Genetics, Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 21, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christian RiedelsheimerDepartment of Applied Genetics, Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 21, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.
H Friedrich UtzDepartment of Applied Genetics, Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 21, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.
Chris-Carolin SchönPlant Breeding, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Albrecht E MelchingerDepartment of Applied Genetics, Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 21, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany. melchinger@uni-hohenheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageDeterministic formulas accurately forecast the decline in predictive ability of genomic prediction with changing testers, target environments or traits and truncation selection. Genomic prediction of testcross performance (TP) was found to be a promising selection tool in hybrid breeding as long as the same tester and environments are used in the training and prediction set. In practice, however, selection targets often change in terms of testers, target environments or traits leading to a reduced predictive ability. Hence, it would be desirable to estimate for given training data the expected decline in the predictive ability of genomic prediction under such settings by deterministic formulas that require only quantitative genetic parameters available from the breeding program. Here, we derived formulas for forecasting the predictive ability under different selection targets in the training and prediction set and applied these to predict the TP of lines based on line per se or testcross evaluations. On the basis of two experiments with maize, we validated our approach in four scenarios characterized by different selection targets. Forecasted and empirically observed predictive abilities obtained by cross-validation generally agreed well, with deviations between -0.06 and 0.01 only. Applying the prediction model to a different tester and/or year reduced the predictive ability by not more than 18%. Accounting additionally for truncation selection in our formulas indicated a substantial reduction in predictive ability in the prediction set, amounting, e.g., to 53% for a selected fraction α = 10%. In conclusion, our deterministic formulas enable forecasting the predictive abilities of new selection targets with sufficient precision and could be used to calculate parameters required for optimizing the allocation of resources in multi-stage genomic selection.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantModels, GeneticCrosses, GeneticForecastingGenomicsGenotypeLinear ModelsLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePlant BreedingSelection, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.