Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231830›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2016

Prioritizing the development of mouse models for childhood brain disorders.

Kevin K Ogden, Emin D Ozkan, Gavin Rumbaugh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eLife · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Current Perspectives in Autism Spectrum Disorder: From Genes to Therapy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  11. SYNGAP1: Mind the Gap.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  12. Canonical and Non-canonical Reelin Signaling.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin K OgdenDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Emin D OzkanDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Gavin RumbaughDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Intersection of causal neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes, cortical circuit function, and cognitive processing required for behavioral adaptionsR01MH096847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Courtney A Miller, GAVIN R RUMBAUGH · 2012 to 2026
$10.4M
Regulation of Memory Formation by the GTPase-activating Protein SynGAPR01NS064079 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RUMBAUGH, GAVIN R · 2009 to 2017
$3.9M
Evaluation of novel biomarkers of cognition in a model of sporadic developmental brain disorders and their application in efficacy testing of Ras pathway inhibitorsR01MH108408 · NIMH · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI RUMBAUGH, GAVIN R · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096847NIMH NIH HHS R01MH096847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108408NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064079NINDS NIH HHS R01NS064079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in hundreds of genes contribute to cognitive and behavioral dysfunction associated with developmental brain disorders (DBDs). Due to the sheer number of risk factors available for study combined with the cost of developing new animal models, it remains an open question how genes should be prioritized for in-depth neurobiological investigations. Recent reviews have argued that priority should be given to frequently mutated genes commonly found in sporadic DBD patients. Intrigued by this idea, we explored to what extent "high priority" risk factors have been studied in animals in an effort to assess their potential for generating valuable preclinical models capable of advancing the neurobiological understanding of DBDs. We found that in-depth whole animal studies are lacking for many high priority genes, with relatively few neurobiological studies performed in construct valid animal models aimed at understanding the pathological substrates associated with disease phenotypes. However, some high priority risk factors have been extensively studied in animal models and they have generated novel insights into DBD patho-neurobiology while also advancing early pre-clinical therapeutic treatment strategies. We suggest that prioritizing model development toward genes frequently mutated in non-specific DBD populations will accelerate the understanding of DBD patho-neurobiology and drive novel therapeutic strategies. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Synaptopathy--from Biology to Therapy'.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain DiseasesHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMutationNeurodevelopmental DisordersPhenotypeResearch DesignRisk FactorsSynapsesAutismDevelopmentEpilepsyIntellectual disabilityMouse modelSchizophreniaSynapseSyngap1

Identifiers

PMID26231830
PMCPMC4586073
OpenAlexW1408742906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.