Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231784›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2015

A review of 3D first-pass, whole-heart, myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Merlin J Fair, Peter D Gatehouse, Edward V R DiBella, David N Firmin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder algorithm for MRI brain reconstruction.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Merlin J FairNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. M.Fair@rbht.nhs.uk.
Peter D GatehouseNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. P.Gatehouse@rbht.nhs.uk.
Edward V R DiBellaUtah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Edward.DiBella@hsc.utah.edu.
David N FirminNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. D.Firmin@rbht.nhs.uk.

Funding

Quantitative cardiac MRI perfusion for longitudinal studiesR01HL113224 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DIBELLA, EDWARD VR · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
British Heart Foundation FS/13/21/30143NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive review is undertaken of the methods available for 3D whole-heart first-pass perfusion (FPP) and their application to date, with particular focus on possible acceleration techniques. Following a summary of the parameters typically desired of 3D FPP methods, the review explains the mechanisms of key acceleration techniques and their potential use in FPP for attaining 3D acquisitions. The mechanisms include rapid sequences, non-Cartesian k-space trajectories, reduced k-space acquisitions, parallel imaging reconstructions and compressed sensing. An attempt is made to explain, rather than simply state, the varying methods with the hope that it will give an appreciation of the different components making up a 3D FPP protocol. Basic estimates demonstrating the required total acceleration factors in typical 3D FPP cases are included, providing context for the extent that each acceleration method can contribute to the required imaging speed, as well as potential limitations in present 3D FPP literature. Although many 3D FPP methods are too early in development for the type of clinical trials required to show any clear benefit over current 2D FPP methods, the review includes the small but growing quantity of clinical research work already using 3D FPP, alongside the more technical work. Broader challenges concerning FPP such as quantitative analysis are not covered, but challenges with particular impact on 3D FPP methods, particularly with regards to motion effects, are discussed along with anticipated future work in the field.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationAnimalsArtifactsCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26231784
PMCPMC4522116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.