Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231760›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2015

Body maps in the infant brain.

Peter J Marshall, Andrew N Meltzoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. THE DEVELOPING BRAIN REVEALED DURING SLEEP.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Ubiquitous Neocortical Decoding of Tactile Input Patterns.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Experimental Evidence of Structural Representation of Hands in Early Infancy.International journal of behavioral development · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The somatosensory mismatch negativity as a window into body representations in infancy.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter J MarshallDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: peter.marshall@temple.edu.
Andrew N MeltzoffInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

The Neuroscience of Self-Other Correspondence in InfancyR21HD083756 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MARSHALL, PETER J · 2015 to 2016
$290k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD083756NICHD NIH HHS R21HD083756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have examined representations of the body in the adult brain but relatively little attention has been paid to ontogenetic aspects of neural body maps in human infants. Novel applications of methods for recording brain activity in infants are delineating cortical body maps in the first months of life. Body maps may facilitate infants' registration of similarities between self and other - an ability that is foundational to developing social cognition. Alterations in interpersonal aspects of body representations might also contribute to social deficits in certain neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Brain MappingHuman BodySelf ConceptAdultAfferent PathwaysAnimalsBrainBrain WavesElectroencephalographyHumansInfantbody mapsbody schemadevelopmentinfancysocial neurosciencesomatotopy

Identifiers

PMID26231760
PMCPMC4556559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.