Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231758›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries.

Moses Ocan, Ekwaro A Obuku, Freddie Bwanga, Dickens Akena, Sennono Richard, Jasper Ogwal-Okeng, Celestino Obua

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 244 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
244citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

244 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 500 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Income level and antibiotic misuse: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Healthcare Utilization Patterns for Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness in an Urban Slum of Delhi: A Prospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

184 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Moses OcanDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. mss_ocan@yahoo.co.uk.
Ekwaro A ObukuAfrica Centre for Systematic Reviews and Knowledge Translation, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. ekwaro@gmail.com.
Freddie BwangaDepartment of Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. fxb18@case.edu.
Dickens AkenaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. akenadickens@yahoo.co.uk.
Sennono RichardInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda. ssenorichard@gmail.com.
Jasper Ogwal-OkengDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. jogwal.okeng@gmail.com.
Celestino ObuaDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. cobua1953@gmail.com.
Makerere University · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Bahrain · BH

Funding

Medical Education for Services to All Ugandans (MESAU)R24TW008886 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEWANKAMBO, NELSON K · 2010 to 2015
$9.2M
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial self-medication is common in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). However there has been no systematic review on non-prescription antimicrobial use in these settings. This review thus intended to establish the burden, risk factors and effects of antimicrobial self-medication in Low and Middle Income Countries.

methodsIn 2012, we registered a systematic review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42012002508). We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases using the following terms; "self-medication", "non-prescription", 'self-treatment', "antimicrobial", "antimalarial", "antibiotic", "antibacterial" "2002-2012" and combining them using Boolean operators. We performed independent and duplicate screening and abstraction of study administrative data, prevalence, determinants, type of antimicrobial agent, source, disease conditions, inappropriate use, drug adverse events and clinical outcomes of antibiotic self-medication where possible. We performed a Random Effects Meta-analysis.

resultsA total of thirty four (34) studies involving 31,340 participants were included in the review. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication was 38.8 % (95 % CI: 29.5-48.1). Most studies assessed non-prescription use of antibacterial (17/34: 50 %) and antimalarial (5/34: 14.7 %) agents. The common disease symptoms managed were, respiratory (50 %), fever (47 %) and gastrointestinal (45 %). The major sources of antimicrobials included, pharmacies (65.5 %), leftover drugs (50 %) and drug shops (37.5 %). Twelve (12) studies reported inappropriate drug use; not completing dose (6/12) and sharing of medicines (4/12). The main determinants of antimicrobial self-medication include, level of education, age, gender, past successful use, severity of illness and income. Reported negative outcomes of antimicrobial self-medication included, allergies (2/34: 5.9 %), lack of cure (4/34: 11.8 %) and causing death (2/34: 5.9 %). The commonly reported positive outcome was recovery from illness (4/34: 11.8 %).

conclusionThe prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication is high and varies in different communities as well as by social determinants of health and is frequently associated with inappropriate drug use.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDeveloping CountriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsHealth BehaviorHumansNonprescription DrugsPrevalenceRisk FactorsSelf CareSelf MedicationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26231758
PMCPMC4522083
OpenAlexW1942976844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.