Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231698›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

Smartphone and Mobile Application Utilization Prior to and Following Treatment Among Individuals Enrolled in Residential Substance Use Treatment.

Jennifer Dahne, Carl W Lejuez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The dynamic interaction between pain and opioid misuse.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer DahneCenter for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion Research, University of Maryland, College Park, 2103 Cole Student Activities Building, College Park, MD, 20742, United States. Electronic address: jdahne@umd.edu.
Carl W LejuezCenter for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion Research, University of Maryland, College Park, 2103 Cole Student Activities Building, College Park, MD, 20742, United States.

Funding

Drug Choice, Impulsivity, and Risky Sexual BehaviorR01DA019405 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
Social phobia and cigarette smoking: An experimental investigationF31DA034999 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DAHNE, JENNIFER RENEE · 2013 to 2014
$78k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA034999NIDA NIH HHS F31DA034999NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019405NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA19405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing completion of substance use treatment, it is crucial for patients to continue to utilize skills learned in treatment for optimal treatment outcomes. Mobile applications (apps) on smartphones offer a unique platform to promote utilization of evidence-based skills following completion of substance use treatment. Despite the promise of mobile apps and smartphones for treatment delivery, it remains unknown whether patients in substance use treatment in the United States have access to smartphones and utilize mobile apps on smartphones. The present study sought to determine smartphone utilization among individuals enrolled in one residential substance use treatment center in the U.S. catering specifically to low-income adults.

methodsParticipants included 251 individuals at a residential substance use treatment center in Washington DC admitted to the center between March, 2014 and January, 2015. During the intake process, participants completed interviewer-administered demographics and psychiatric questionnaires as well as a self-report of technology utilization.

resultsResults indicated that the majority of patients in this residential substance use treatment center owned mobile phones prior to treatment entry (86.9%) and expected to own mobile phones after leaving treatment (92.6%). Moreover, the majority of these phones were (68.5%) or will be smartphones (72.4%) on which patients reported utilizing mobile applications (prior to treatment: 61.3%; post treatment: 64.3%) and accessing the Internet (prior to treatment: 61.3%; post treatment: 65.9%).

conclusionsMobile phone and smartphone ownership among this sample were comparable to ownership among U.S. adults broadly. Findings suggest that smartphones and mobile apps may hold clinical utility for fostering continued use of treatment skills following substance use treatment completion.

Indexed as

Residential TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsOwnershipSmartphoneSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesMobile applicationsSmartphonesSubstance use treatmentTechnology

Identifiers

PMID26231698
PMCPMC4581950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.