Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231516›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2015

Strategies to overcome barriers to implementing osteoporosis and fracture prevention guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative analysis of action plans suggested by front line staff in Ontario, Canada.

Sultan H Alamri, Courtney C Kennedy, Sharon Marr, Lynne Lohfeld, Carly J Skidmore, Alexandra Papaioannou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sultan H AlamriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. shalamri1@kau.edu.sa.
Courtney C KennedyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. kennedyc@HHSC.CA.
Sharon MarrDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. marrs@mcmaster.ca.
Lynne LohfeldDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada. lohfeld@mcmaster.ca.
Carly J SkidmoreJuravinski Research Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences - St. Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. skidmorec@hhsc.ca.
Alexandra PapaioannouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. papaioannou@HHSC.CA.

Funding

CIHR 114982-1CIHR MOP-114982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is a major global health problem, especially among long-term care (LTC) facilities. Despite the availability of effective clinical guidelines to prevent osteoporosis and bone fractures, few LTC homes actually adhere to these practical recommendations. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices for osteoporosis and fracture prevention in LTC facilities and elicit practical strategies to address these barriers.

methodsWe performed a qualitative analysis of action plans formulated by Professional Advisory Committee (PAC) teams at 12 LTC homes in the intervention arm of the Vitamin D and Osteoporosis Study (ViDOS) in Ontario, Canada. PAC teams were comprised of medical directors, administrators, directors of care, pharmacists, dietitians, and other staff. Thematic content analysis was performed to identify the key themes emerging from the action plans.

resultsLTC teams identified several barriers, including lack of educational information and resources prior to the ViDOS intervention, difficulty obtaining required patient information for fracture risk assessment, and inconsistent prescribing of vitamin D and calcium at the time of admission. The most frequently suggested recommendations was to establish and adhere to standard admission orders regarding vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis therapies, improve the use of electronic medical records for osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment, and require bone health as a topic at quarterly reviews and multidisciplinary conferences.

conclusionsThis qualitative study identified several important barriers and practical recommendations for improving the implementation of osteoporosis and fracture prevention guidelines in LTC settings.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersFractures, BoneHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLong-Term CareOsteoporosisAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHumansMaleOntarioPreventive Health ServicesQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID26231516
PMCPMC4522131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.