Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231509›Full record

ArticleCurrent environmental health reports2015

MDI Biological Laboratory Arsenic Summit: Approaches to Limiting Human Exposure to Arsenic.

Bruce A Stanton, Kathleen Caldwell, Clare Bates Congdon, Jane Disney, Maria Donahue, Elizabeth Ferguson, Elsie Flemings, Meredith Golden, Mary Lou Guerinot, Jay Highman and 15 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Current environmental health reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Environmental toxic metal contaminants and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Circulating miRNAs Associated with Arsenic Exposure.Environmental science & technology · 2018
    Article
  13. Metabolic Phenotype of Wild-Type andEnvironmental health perspectives · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Bruce A StantonCenter for the Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA, bas@Dartmouth.edu.
Kathleen Caldwell
Clare Bates Congdon
Jane Disney
Maria Donahue
Elizabeth Ferguson
Elsie Flemings
Meredith Golden
Mary Lou Guerinot
Jay Highman
Karen James
Carol Kim
R Clark Lantz
Robert G Marvinney
Greg Mayer
David Miller
Ana Navas-Acien
D Kirk Nordstrom
Sonia Postema
Laurie Rardin
Barry Rosen
Arup SenGupta
Joseph Shaw
Elizabeth Stanton
Paul Susca

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Jon D Chorover · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
VARIATION IN BIOACCUMULATION AND BIOMAGNIFICATION OF METALS IN NORTHERN US LAKESP42ES007373 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STANTON, BRUCE A. · 1995 to 2019
$52.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report is the outcome of the meeting "Environmental and Human Health Consequences of Arsenic" held at the MDI Biological Laboratory in Salisbury Cove, Maine, August 13-15, 2014. Human exposure to arsenic represents a significant health problem worldwide that requires immediate attention according to the World Health Organization (WHO). One billion people are exposed to arsenic in food, and more than 200 million people ingest arsenic via drinking water at concentrations greater than international standards. Although the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set a limit of 10 μg/L in public water supplies and the WHO has recommended an upper limit of 10 μg/L, recent studies indicate that these limits are not protective enough. In addition, there are currently few standards for arsenic in food. Those who participated in the Summit support citizens, scientists, policymakers, industry, and educators at the local, state, national, and international levels to (1) establish science-based evidence for setting standards at the local, state, national, and global levels for arsenic in water and food; (2) work with government agencies to set regulations for arsenic in water and food, to establish and strengthen non-regulatory programs, and to strengthen collaboration among government agencies, NGOs, academia, the private sector, industry, and others; (3) develop novel and cost-effective technologies for identification and reduction of exposure to arsenic in water; (4) develop novel and cost-effective approaches to reduce arsenic exposure in juice, rice, and other relevant foods; and (5) develop an Arsenic Education Plan to guide the development of science curricula as well as community outreach and education programs that serve to inform students and consumers about arsenic exposure and engage them in well water testing and development of remediation strategies.

Indexed as

ArsenicCommunity-Institutional RelationsDrinking WaterEnvironmental ExposureFood ContaminationGovernment RegulationHumansMaximum Allowable ConcentrationPublic HealthRisk AssessmentUnited StatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater SupplyArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID26231509
PMCPMC4522277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.