Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231506›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2015

Oral Chromium Exposure and Toxicity.

Hong Sun, Jason Brocato, Max Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Human Health Effects of Oral Exposure to Chromium: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Method and mechanism of chromium removal from soil: a systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mechanism of Liver Injury Induced by CrAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Exposure to low levels of hexavalent chromium in drinking water alters diet-induced steatotic liver disease in male rats.Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong SunDepartment of Environmental Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, 57 Old Forge Road, Tuxedo, NY, 10987, USA, Hong.sun@nyumc.org.
Jason Brocato
Max Costa

Funding

RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (CENTER GRANT)P30ES000260 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COSTA, MAX · 1985 to 2020
$26.1M
SATB2 and Nickel CarcingenesisR01ES022935 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COSTA, MAX · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Epigenetic Dysregulation by Oxidative Stress from Environmental InsultsR01ES023174 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COSTA, MAX, CUDDAPAH, SURESH · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Chromium and Hedgehog signalingR03ES023028 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SUN, HONG · 2013 to 2014
$169k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000260NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES 022935NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022935NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES023174NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES 034174NIEHS NIH HHS R03 ES023028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known carcinogen when inhaled. However, inhalational exposure to Cr(VI) affects only a small portion of the population, mainly by occupational exposures. In contrast, oral exposure to Cr(VI) is widespread and affects many people throughout the globe. In 2008, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) released a 2-year study demonstrating that ingested Cr(VI) was carcinogenic in rats and mice. The effects of Cr(VI) oral exposure are mitigated by reduction in the gut; however, a portion evades the reductive detoxification and reaches target tissues. Once Cr(VI) enters the cell, it ultimately gets reduced to Cr(III), which mediates its toxicity via induction of oxidative stress during the reduction while Cr intermediates react with protein and DNA. Cr(III) can form adducts with DNA that may lead to mutations. This review will discuss the potential adverse effects of oral exposure to Cr(VI) by presenting up-to-date human and animal studies, examining the underlying mechanisms that mediate Cr(VI) toxicity, as well as highlighting opportunities for future research.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsCarcinogens, EnvironmentalChromiumDrinking WaterEpigenomicsFood ContaminationHumansMiceRatsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarcinogens, EnvironmentalChromiumchromium hexavalent ionDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID26231506
PMCPMC4522702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.