Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231457›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2015

The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study.

Elisa De Franco, Sarah E Flanagan, Jayne A L Houghton, Hana Lango Allen, Deborah J G Mackay, I Karen Temple, Sian Ellard, Andrew T Hattersley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03369821 (Understanding Beta-cell Destruction Through the Study of EXtremely Early-onset Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03369821 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Beta-cell Destruction Through the Study of EXtremely Early-onset Type 1 Diabetes (A Musketeers' Memorandum Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ExeterRan2017 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsType1 Diabetes MellitusArmsBeta Cell Loss and Immune Function, Immune Function with RNAseq
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Novel Renal Manifestation inJournal of medical cases · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetic risk in extremely early onset type 1 diabetes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Neonatal diabetes mellitus is a significant feature of COXPD-24 caused by recessive NARS2 variants.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa De FrancoInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Sarah E FlanaganInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Jayne A L HoughtonInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Hana Lango AllenInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Deborah J G MackayWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK; University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK; Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
I Karen TempleWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK; University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sian EllardInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Andrew T HattersleyInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. Electronic address: A.T.Hattersley@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098395Wellcome Trust WT097835MFWellcome Trust WT098395/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust WT101650MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional genetic testing focusses on analysis of one or a few genes according to clinical features; this approach is changing as improved sequencing methods enable simultaneous analysis of several genes. Neonatal diabetes is the presenting feature of many discrete clinical phenotypes defined by different genetic causes. Genetic subtype defines treatment, with improved glycaemic control on sulfonylurea treatment for most patients with potassium channel mutations. We investigated the effect of early, comprehensive testing of all known genetic causes of neonatal diabetes.

methodsIn this large, international, cohort study, we studied patients with neonatal diabetes diagnosed with diabetes before 6 months of age who were referred from 79 countries. We identified mutations by comprehensive genetic testing including Sanger sequencing, 6q24 methylation analysis, and targeted next-generation sequencing of all known neonatal diabetes genes.

findingsBetween January, 2000, and August, 2013, genetic testing was done in 1020 patients (571 boys, 449 girls). Mutations in the potassium channel genes were the most common cause (n=390) of neonatal diabetes, but were identified less frequently in consanguineous families (12% in consanguineous families vs 46% in non-consanguineous families; p<0·0001). Median duration of diabetes at the time of genetic testing decreased from more than 4 years before 2005 to less than 3 months after 2012. Earlier referral for genetic testing affected the clinical phenotype. In patients with genetically diagnosed Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, 23 (88%) of 26 patients tested within 3 months from diagnosis had isolated diabetes, compared with three (17%) of 18 patients referred later (>4 years; p<0·0001), in whom skeletal and liver involvement was common. Similarly, for patients with genetically diagnosed transient neonatal diabetes, the diabetes had remitted in only ten (10%) of 101 patients tested early (<3 months) compared with 60 (100%) of the 60 later referrals (p<0·0001).

interpretationPatients are now referred for genetic testing closer to their presentation with neonatal diabetes. Comprehensive testing of all causes identified causal mutations in more than 80% of cases. The genetic result predicts the best diabetes treatment and development of related features. This model represents a new framework for clinical care with genetic diagnosis preceding development of clinical features and guiding clinical management.

fundingWellcome Trust and Diabetes UK.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleMutation

Identifiers

PMID26231457
PMCPMC4772451
OpenAlexW1757525562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.