Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231397›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2015

Barriers related to non-adherence in a mammography breast-screening program during the implementation period in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil.

René Aloisio da Costa Vieira, Tânia Silveira Lourenço, Edmundo Carvalho Mauad, Valter Gonçalves Moreira Filho, Stela Verzinhasse Peres, Thiago Buosi Silva, Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Lattore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Breast cancer screening in developing countries.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors Affecting Women's Participation in Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

René Aloisio da Costa VieiraBarretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil; Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Brazil. Electronic address: posgrad@hcancerbarretos.com.br.
Tânia Silveira LourençoBotucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Brazil; Prevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil.
Edmundo Carvalho MauadBarretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil; Prevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil.
Valter Gonçalves Moreira FilhoPrevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil.
Stela Verzinhasse PeresNucleus for Researcher Support, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil.
Thiago Buosi SilvaPrevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil.
Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira LattoreNucleus for Researcher Support, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil; Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammography is the best exam for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Developing countries frequently have a low income of mammography and absence of organized screening. The knowledge of vulnerable population and strategies to increase adherence are important to improve the implementation of an organized breast-screening program. A mammography regional-screening program was implemented in a place around 54.238 women, aged 40-69 years old. It was proposed to perform biannual mammography free of cost for the women. We analyze the first 2 years of the implementation of the project. Mammography was realized in 17.964 women. 42.1% of the women hadn't done de mammography in their lives and these women were principally from low socio-economic status (OR=2.99), low education (OR=3.00). The best strategies to include these women were mobile unit (OR=1.43) and Family Health Program (OR=1.79). The incidence of early breast tumors before the project was 14.5%, a fact that changed to 43.2% in this phase. Multivariate analysis showed that the association of illiterate and the mobile unit achieve more women who had not performed mammography in their lives. The strategies to increase adherence to mammography must be multiple and a large organization is necessary to overpass the barriers related to system health and education.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultAgedBrazilBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceRetrospective StudiesBreast neoplasmsCancer early detectionCommunity health planningDeveloping countriesMass screening

Identifiers

PMID26231397
PMCPMC7320532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.