Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231241›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2015

Human Infections with Staphylococcus aureus CC398.

Tara C Smith, Shylo E Wardyn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitiveOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TheGenes · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Communications medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Prevalence of methicillin-resistantInfection prevention in practice · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tara C SmithKent State University College of Public Health, 750 Hilltop Drive, Lowry Hall, Kent, OH, USA, tsmit176@kent.edu.
Shylo E Wardyn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus isolates belonging to clonal cluster 398 (CC398) have emerged over the previous decade as a risk to livestock workers. Though most of the research to date has focused on colonization with these strains, a number of infections have also been documented, ranging from mild skin infections to more serious invasive infections and even death. Here, we review existing reports of human infections with CC398 and discuss their geographic distribution, general characteristics, and implications for future research. We identified 74 publications describing CC398 infections in humans in 19 different countries, suggesting this is an emerging worldwide issue.

Indexed as

AdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBiological EvolutionChild, PreschoolFemaleGenome, BacterialHumansLivestockMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.