Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26231070›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Automatic detection of protected health information from clinic narratives.

Hui Yang, Jonathan M Garibaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Context-Enhanced De-identification System.ACM transactions on computing for healthcare · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020
    Review
  13. Using word embeddings to improve the privacy of clinical notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Feature-Driven Decision Support System for Heart Failure Prediction Based onComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui YangSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Advanced Data Analysis Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: Hui.Yang@nottingham.ac.uk.
Jonathan M GaribaldiSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Advanced Data Analysis Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
Medical Research Council MR/N005953/1NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a natural language processing (NLP) system that was designed to participate in the 2014 i2b2 de-identification challenge. The challenge task aims to identify and classify seven main Protected Health Information (PHI) categories and 25 associated sub-categories. A hybrid model was proposed which combines machine learning techniques with keyword-based and rule-based approaches to deal with the complexity inherent in PHI categories. Our proposed approaches exploit a rich set of linguistic features, both syntactic and word surface-oriented, which are further enriched by task-specific features and regular expression template patterns to characterize the semantics of various PHI categories. Our system achieved promising accuracy on the challenge test data with an overall micro-averaged F-measure of 93.6%, which was the winner of this de-identification challenge.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityNarrationChinaCohort StudiesData MiningElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPattern Recognition, AutomatedVocabulary, ControlledClinical text miningDe-identificationHybrid modelNatural language processingProtected Health Information (PHI)

Identifiers

PMID26231070
PMCPMC4989090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.