Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26230978›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2015

Understanding spike-triggered covariance using Wiener theory for receptive field identification.

Roman A Sandler, Vasilis Z Marmarelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multidimensional stimulus encoding in the auditory nerve of the barn owl.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Coding Schemes in the Archerfish Optic Tectum.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018
    Article
  9. Methodology of Recurrent Laguerre-Volterra Network for Modeling Nonlinear Dynamic Systems.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roman A Sandler
Vasilis Z Marmarelis

Funding

TrainingP41EB001978 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KHOO, MICHAEL C K · 2003 to 2017
$18.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001978NIBIB NIH HHS P41-EB001978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptive field identification is a vital problem in sensory neurophysiology and vision. Much research has been done in identifying the receptive fields of nonlinear neurons whose firing rate is determined by the nonlinear interactions of a small number of linear filters. Despite more advanced methods that have been proposed, spike-triggered covariance (STC) continues to be the most widely used method in such situations due to its simplicity and intuitiveness. Although the connection between STC and Wiener/Volterra kernels has often been mentioned in the literature, this relationship has never been explicitly derived. Here we derive this relationship and show that the STC matrix is actually a modified version of the second-order Wiener kernel, which incorporates the input autocorrelation and mixes first- and second-order dynamics. It is then shown how, with little modification of the STC method, the Wiener kernels may be obtained and, from them, the principal dynamic modes, a set of compact and efficient linear filters that essentially combine the spike-triggered average and STC matrix and generalize to systems with both continuous and point-process outputs. Finally, using Wiener theory, we show how these obtained filters may be corrected when they were estimated using correlated inputs. Our correction technique is shown to be superior to those commonly used in the literature for both correlated Gaussian images and natural images.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSignal Detection, PsychologicalHumansMathematicsNormal DistributionPattern Recognition, VisualRetinal NeuronsVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID26230978
PMCPMC4525694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.