Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26230580›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Gout and Risk of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Shuang-Chun Liu, Lei Xia, Jin Zhang, Xue-Hong Lu, Da-Kang Hu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Hai-Jun Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Gout Classification Criteria: Update and Implications.Current rheumatology reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuang-Chun LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lei XiaDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Affiliated Renji Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xue-Hong LuDepartment of Pediatrics, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Da-Kang HuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hai-Tao ZhangDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Taizhou Municipal Hospital,Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hai-Jun LiDepartment of Neurology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Taizhou Municipal Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA high incidence of myocardial infarction among patients with gout has been suggested by several observational studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between gout and the risk of myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to October 2014 for cohort studies that evaluating the association between gout and the risk of myocardial infarction. Summary estimates were derived using a random-effects model and reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsFive studies involving 8,656,413 participants with a total of 1000 MI events were included. Overall, gout was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.75; p<0.001), and the association referred to non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.39; p <0.001) but not fatal myocardial infarction (RR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28; p = 0.174). The increased risk was observed in both women (RR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18-2.21; p = 0.003) and men (RR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.74; p <0.001). Stratified analysis revealed a gradual increase in myocardial infarction risk with a younger age of gout onset (age 20-44 years old (RR 2.82; 95% CI, 1.38-5.79; p = 0.05); 45-69 years old (RR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.22-2.82; p = 0.04); ≥70 years old (RR 1.52; 95% CI, 1.22-1.88; p <0.001)).

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that patients with gout have an increased risk of myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesGoutHumansMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26230580
PMCPMC4521845
OpenAlexW1721524240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.