Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26230578›Full record

ArticleSocial neuroscience2016

Morphological differences in the mirror neuron system in Williams syndrome.

Rowena Ng, Timothy T Brown, Matthew Erhart, Anna M Järvinen, Julie R Korenberg, Ursula Bellugi, Eric Halgren

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Autism and Williams syndrome: truly mirror conditions in the socio-cognitive domain?International journal of developmental disabilities · 2022
    Review
  3. A cross-comparison of cognitive ability across 8 genomic disorders.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rowena Nga Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience , Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Timothy T Brownc Multimodal Imaging Laboratory , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Matthew Erhartc Multimodal Imaging Laboratory , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Anna M Järvinena Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience , Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Julie R Korenberge Center for Integrated Neuroscience and Human Behavior , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
Ursula Bellugia Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience , Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Eric Halgrenc Multimodal Imaging Laboratory , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Williams Syndrome: The Molecular Genetic CharacterizationP01HD033113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BELLUGI, URSULA · 1996 to 2015
$19.4M
VARIANTS OF FOCAL BRAIN INJURYP50NS022343 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TRAUNER, DORIS A · 1985 to 2012
$15.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033113NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS022343PHS HHS NICHD 033113PHS HHS NINDS 22343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a genetic condition characterized by an overly gregarious personality, including high empathetic concern for others. Although seemingly disparate from the profile of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), both are associated with deficits in social communication/cognition. Notably, the mirror neuron system (MNS) has been implicated in social dysfunction for ASD; yet, the integrity of this network and its association with social functioning in WS remains unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods were used to examine the structural integrity of the MNS of adults with WS versus typically developing (TD) individuals. The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a tool typically used to screen for social features of ASD, was also employed to assess the relationships between social functioning with the MNS morphology in WS participants. WS individuals showed reduced cortical surface area of MNS substrates yet relatively preserved cortical thickness as compared to TD adults. Increased cortical thickness of the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) was associated with increased deficits in social communication, social awareness, social cognition, and autistic mannerisms. However, social motivation was not related to anatomical features of the MNS. Our findings indicate that social deficits typical to both ASD and WS may be attributed to an aberrant MNS, whereas the unusual social drive marked in WS is subserved by substrates distinct from this network.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceAutism Spectrum DisorderFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMirror NeuronsSocial Behavior DisordersWilliams SyndromeYoung AdultMirror neuron systemSocial cognitionSocial communicationSocial neuroscienceWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26230578
PMCPMC4758907
OpenAlexW1629682481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.