Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26230497›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Microarray-Based Analysis of Methylation Status of CpGs in Placental DNA and Maternal Blood DNA--Potential New Epigenetic Biomarkers for Cell Free Fetal DNA-Based Diagnosis.

Lotte Hatt, Mads M Aagaard, Jesper Graakjaer, Cathrine Bach, Steffen Sommer, Inge E Agerholm, Steen Kølvraa, Anders Bojesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Disease prediction by cell-free DNA methylation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Maternal 5Frontiers in genetics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lotte HattDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, 7100, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Mads M AagaardDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Jesper GraakjaerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Cathrine BachDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Steffen SommerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Inge E AgerholmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Steen KølvraaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, 7100, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Anders BojesenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, 7100, Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic markers for cell free fetal DNA in the maternal blood circulation are highly interesting in the field of non-invasive prenatal testing since such markers will offer a possibility to quantify the amount of fetal DNA derived from different chromosomes in a maternal blood sample. The aim of the present study was to define new fetal specific epigenetic markers present in placental DNA that can be utilized in non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. We have conducted a high-resolution methylation specific beadchip microarray study assessing more than 450.000 CpG sites. We have analyzed the DNA methylation profiles of 10 maternal blood samples and compared them to 12 1st trimesters chorionic samples from normal placentas, identifying a number of CpG sites that are differentially methylated in maternal blood cells compared to chorionic tissue. To strengthen the utility of these differentially methylated CpG sites to be used with methyl-sensitive restriction enzymes (MSRE) in PCR-based NIPD, we furthermore refined the list of selected sites, containing a restriction sites for one of 16 different methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. We present a list of markers on chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 with a potential for aneuploidy testing as well as a list of markers for regions harboring sub-microscopic deletion- or duplication syndromes.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisCell-Free SystemDNAFemaleFetusHumansPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstDNA

Identifiers

PMID26230497
PMCPMC4521692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.