Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26230074›Full record

ArticleAssay and drug development technologies2015

Phenotypic assays to identify agents that induce reactive gliosis: a counter-screen to prioritize compounds for preclinical animal studies.

Samuel R Beckerman, Joaquin E Jimenez, Yan Shi, Hassan Al-Ali, John L Bixby, Vance P Lemmon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assay and drug development technologies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High content analysis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2017
    Review
  4. In vitro models of axon regeneration.Experimental neurology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel R Beckerman1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Joaquin E Jimenez1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Yan Shi1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Hassan Al-Ali1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
John L Bixby1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
Vance P Lemmon1 The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, Florida.
University of Miami · US

Funding

Novel Gene Targets for CNS Axonal RegenerationR01HD057632 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BIXBY, JOHN L, LEMMON, VANCE P · 2007 to 2018
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS 2R01HD057632NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocyte phenotypes change in a process called reactive gliosis after traumatic central nervous system (CNS) injury. Astrogliosis is characterized by expansion of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) cytoskeleton, adoption of stellate morphologies, and differential expression of some extracellular matrix molecules. The astrocytic response immediately after injury is beneficial, but in the chronic injury phase, reactive astrocytes produce inhibitory factors (i.e., chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans [CSPGs]) that limit the regrowth of injured axons. There are no drugs that promote axon regeneration or functional recovery after CNS trauma in humans. To develop novel therapeutics for the injured CNS, we screened various libraries in a phenotypic assay to identify compounds that promote neurite outgrowth. However, the effects these compounds have on astrocytes are unknown. Specifically, we were interested in whether compounds could alter astrocytes in a manner that mimics the glial reaction to injury. To test this hypothesis, we developed cell-based phenotypic bioassays to measure changes in (1) GFAP morphology/localization and (2) CSPG expression/immunoreactivity from primary astrocyte cultures. These assays were optimized for six-point dose-response experiments in 96-well plates. The GFAP morphology assay is suitable for counter-screening with a Z-factor of 0.44±0.03 (mean±standard error of the mean; N=3 biological replicates). The CSPG assay is reproducible and informative, but does not satisfy common metrics for a "screenable" assay. As proof of principle, we tested a small set of hit compounds from our neurite outgrowth bioassay and identified one that can enhance axon growth without exacerbating the deleterious characteristics of reactive gliosis.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnimalsBrain InjuriesCells, CulturedChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGliosisHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuritesPhenotypeProtein Kinase InhibitorsRatsSpinal Cord InjuriesChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26230074
PMCPMC4555645
OpenAlexW1827772331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.