Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229974›Full record

ArticleTobacco regulatory science2015

A Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Portrayal in Newspapers.

Katherine Yates, Katherine Friedman, Michael D Slater, Micah Berman, Electra D Paskett, Amy K Ferketich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco regulatory science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of E-Cigarette Marketing Communication: Messages, Communication Channels, and Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Communication through Chinese Media on E-Cigarette: A Topic Modeling Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Valence of Media Coverage About Electronic Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products From 2014 to 2017: Evidence From Automated Content Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  12. From the Deeming Rule to JUUL-US News Coverage of Electronic Cigarettes, 2015-2018.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Content Analysis of US News Stories About E-Cigarettes in 2015.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine YatesThe Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, OH.
Katherine FriedmanThe Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH.
Michael D SlaterThe Ohio State University School of Communication, Columbus, OH.
Micah BermanThe Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH.
Electra D PaskettThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Amy K FerketichThe Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH.

Funding

Project 4: Comprehension of Health Risks in More and Less Arousing Affe p240-275P50CA180908 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHIELDS, PETER G., WEWERS, MARY ELLEN · 2013 to 2017
$18.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine how electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are portrayed in newspaper informative articles and opinion pieces.

methodsA content analysis was conducted on 450 articles published in the United States from 1997 to mid-2014 and obtained by a Newsbank search. The articles were reliably coded for overall frame, type of article, first topic and main topics addressed.

resultsThe article topics have changed over time and suggest significant differences between news articles and opinion pieces. Informative articles focused on e-cigarette regulation, while opinion pieces highlighted their increasing popularity and perceived health benefits.

conclusionsThis content analysis uncovered significant interest in e-cigarettes, particularly in their regulation. The FDA should consider public perceptions of e-cigarettes when developing regulations.

Indexed as

content analysise-cigarettesnewspapersregulation

Identifiers

PMID26229974
PMCPMC4517829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.