Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229689›Full record

ReviewNeural plasticity2015

Neural Plasticity in Multiple Sclerosis: The Functional and Molecular Background.

Dominika Justyna Ksiazek-Winiarek, Piotr Szpakowski, Andrzej Glabinski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural plasticity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05811013 (Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05811013 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation (tSMS) in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2023 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsProgressive Multiple SclerosisArmsTranscranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS), Sham Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Does M1 anodal transcranial direct current stimulation affects online and offline motor learning in patients with multiple sclerosis?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Frontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominika Justyna Ksiazek-WiniarekDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego Street 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland.
Piotr SzpakowskiDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego Street 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland.
Andrzej GlabinskiDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego Street 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune neurodegenerative disorder resulting in motor dysfunction and cognitive decline. The inflammatory and neurodegenerative changes seen in the brains of MS patients lead to progressive disability and increasing brain atrophy. The most common type of MS is characterized by episodes of clinical exacerbations and remissions. This suggests the presence of compensating mechanisms for accumulating damage. Apart from the widely known repair mechanisms like remyelination, another important phenomenon is neuronal plasticity. Initially, neuroplasticity was connected with the developmental stages of life; however, there is now growing evidence confirming that structural and functional reorganization occurs throughout our lifetime. Several functional studies, utilizing such techniques as fMRI, TBS, or MRS, have provided valuable data about the presence of neuronal plasticity in MS patients. CNS ability to compensate for neuronal damage is most evident in RR-MS; however it has been shown that brain plasticity is also preserved in patients with substantial brain damage. Regardless of the numerous studies, the molecular background of neuronal plasticity in MS is still not well understood. Several factors, like IL-1β, BDNF, PDGF, or CB1Rs, have been implicated in functional recovery from the acute phase of MS and are thus considered as potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBrainBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHumansInterleukin-1betaMultiple SclerosisPeptide FragmentsPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Recovery of FunctionAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorInterleukin-1betaPeptide FragmentsPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

Identifiers

PMID26229689
PMCPMC4503575
OpenAlexW1490521057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.