Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229483›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2015

IL-2 -330T/G polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Hongyu Zhao, Rui Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongyu ZhaoCentral Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Rui WangNanjing Kingmed Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Kingmed Diagnostics · CNSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSome studies have investigated the association of IL-2 -330T/G (rs2069762) polymorphism with cancer risk, but the previous results were conflicting and had relatively low statistical power. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the association between IL-2 -330T/G polymorphism and cancer risk.

methodsA literature search was performed systematically using electronic databases. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the pooled effect.

resultsA total of ten studies including 3,060 cases and 3,435 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that IL-2 -330T/G polymorphism was significantly associated with cancer risk ([OR =2.03, 95% CI =1.40-2.95] for GG vs TT; [OR =1.37, 95% CI =1.11-1.69] for GT vs TT; [OR =1.46, 95% CI =1.18-1.81] for [GG + GT] vs TT; [OR =1.66, 95% CI =1.24-2.23] for GG vs [GT + TT]; and [OR =1.35, 95% CI =1.16-1.57] for G vs T). In the subgroup analysis according to cancer type, significant association was found in lymphoma ([OR =1.46, 95% CI =1.11-1.91] for GT vs TT; [OR =1.58, 95% CI =1.22-2.05] for [GG + GT] vs TT; [OR =1.84, 95% CI =1.22-2.77] for GG vs [GT + TT]) and other cancers, but not in gastric cancer. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the significant risk was found among Asians, but not among Europeans.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that IL-2 -330T/G polymorphism has an increased risk of cancer in Asians. However, further detailed studies are still required to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

cancerIL-2meta-analysispolymorphismrisk

Identifiers

PMID26229483
PMCPMC4514317
OpenAlexW1813360169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.