ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015
Validation of an administrative claims-based diagnostic code for pneumonia in a US-based commercially insured COPD population.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Generic Versus Brand-Name Fluticasone-Salmeterol to Treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Annals of internal medicine · 2023Trial
- Fluticasone- vs Budesonide-Based Dual Therapy for COPD.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- The comparative effectiveness and safety of fluticasone-salmeterol via metered-dose versus dry powder inhalers for COPD: A new user cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of single inhaler triple therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: new user cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Guideline-Concordant Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Hospitalized Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Accuracy of the recording of pneumonia events in English electronic healthcare record data in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2024Article
- Best Practices for Identifying Hospitalized Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Using Administrative Data: A Systematic Literature Review of Validation Studies.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Review
- Epidemiology of Pertussis and Pertussis-Related Complications in Adults: A German Claims Data Analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Article
- Agreement in All-in-One Dataset between Diagnosis and Prescribed Medication for Common Cardiometabolic Diseases in the NDB-K7Ps.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Incidence of non-invasive all-cause pneumonia in children in the United States before and after the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a retrospective claims database analysis.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2023Article
- Validity of ICD codes to identify do-not-resuscitate orders among older adults with heart failure: A single center study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Increasing likelihood of prescribing recommended lipid management: Primary care providers' participation in cardiology continuing medical education.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Validation study of the claims-based definition for age-related macular degeneration at a single university hospital in Japan.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Validation of discharge diagnosis codes to identify serious infections among middle age and older adults.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Pneumonia risk in asthma patients using inhaled corticosteroids: a quasi-cohort study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Health Care Utilization and Costs After Initiating Budesonide/Formoterol Combination or Fluticasone/Salmeterol Combination Among COPD Patients New to ICS/LABA Treatment.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Article
- Management of cough in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung diseases in primary care.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
- Comparison of Risk of Pneumonia Caused by Fluticasone Propionate versus Budesonide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArticle
- Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non-First Nations patients in Northern Alberta.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the accuracy of claims-based pneumonia diagnoses in COPD patients using clinical information in medical records as the reference standard.
methodsSelecting from a repository containing members' data from 14 regional United States health plans, this validation study identified pneumonia diagnoses within a group of patients initiating treatment for COPD between March 1, 2009 and March 31, 2012. Patients with ≥1 claim for pneumonia (International Classification of Diseases Version 9-CM code 480.xx-486.xx) were identified during the 12 months following treatment initiation. A subset of 800 patients was randomly selected to abstract medical record data (paper based and electronic) for a target sample of 400 patients, to estimate validity within 5% margin of error. Positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for the claims diagnosis of pneumonia relative to the reference standard, defined as a documented diagnosis in the medical record.
resultsA total of 388 records were reviewed; 311 included a documented pneumonia diagnosis, indicating 80.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.8% to 84.0%) of claims-identified pneumonia diagnoses were validated by the medical charts. Claims-based diagnoses in inpatient or emergency departments (n=185) had greater PPV versus outpatient settings (n=203), 87.6% (95% CI: 81.9%-92.0%) versus 73.4% (95% CI: 66.8%-79.3%), respectively. Claims-diagnoses verified with paper-based charts had similar PPV as the overall study sample, 80.2% (95% CI: 71.1%-87.5%), and higher PPV than those linked to electronic medical records, 73.3% (95% CI: 65.5%-80.2%). Combined paper-based and electronic records had a higher PPV, 87.6% (95% CI: 80.9%-92.6%).
conclusionAdministrative claims data indicating a diagnosis of pneumonia in COPD patients are supported by medical records. The accuracy of a medical record diagnosis of pneumonia remains unknown. With increased use of claims data in medical research, COPD researchers can study pneumonia with confidence that claims data are a valid tool when studying the safety of COPD therapies that could potentially lead to increased pneumonia susceptibility or severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.