Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229409›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.

Francis J DeAsis, Brittany Lapin, Matthew E Gitelis, Michael B Ujiki

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04440514 (Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04440514 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSykehuset Innlandet HFRan2020 to 2035Enrolled150ConditionsParastomal HerniaArmsendoscopic preperitoneal repair of parastomal hernia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Guideline
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for parastomal hernia using the ePauli technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francis J DeAsisFrancis J DeAsis, Brittany Lapin, Matthew E Gitelis, Michael B Ujiki, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, United States.
Brittany LapinFrancis J DeAsis, Brittany Lapin, Matthew E Gitelis, Michael B Ujiki, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, United States.
Matthew E GitelisFrancis J DeAsis, Brittany Lapin, Matthew E Gitelis, Michael B Ujiki, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, United States.
Michael B UjikiFrancis J DeAsis, Brittany Lapin, Matthew E Gitelis, Michael B Ujiki, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.

methodsA systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords: stoma repair, laparoscopic, parastomal, and hernia. Case reports, studies with less than 5 patients, and articles not written in English were excluded. Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study. If there was any discrepancy between scores, the study in question was referred to another author. A meta -analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia. Secondary outcomes were mesh infection, surgical site infection, obstruction requiring reoperation, death, and other complications. Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated. Except for recurrence, most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.

resultsFifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review. Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort, and not by approach. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8% (95%CI: 0.8-3.2), and there was no difference between techniques. The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection, which was seen in 3.8% (95%CI: 2.3-5.7). Infected mesh was observed in 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-3.1), and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-3.0). Other complications such as ileus, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection were noted in 16.6% (95%CI: 11.9-22.1). Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4% (95%CI: 9.5-26.9). The recurrence rate was 10.2% (95%CI: 3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach, whereas the recurrence rate was 27.9% (95%CI: 12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach. There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.

conclusionLaparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia. A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyChi-Square DistributionHernia, AbdominalHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRisk FactorsSurgical MeshSurgical StomasTreatment OutcomeColostomyHerniaIleostomyKeyholeLaparoscopicParastomalRepairSandwichSugarbakerTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26229409
PMCPMC4515848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.