Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229406›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with N2-3 status.

Yu-Zhen Zheng, Wei Zhao, Yi Hu, Xiao-Xiao Ding-Lin, Jing Wen, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Translational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Zhen ZhengYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Wei ZhaoYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Yi HuYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiao-Xiao Ding-LinYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing WenYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Hong YangYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Qian-Wen LiuYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Kong-Jia LuoYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Qing-Yuan HuangYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Jun-Ying ChenYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Jian-Hua FuYu-Zhen Zheng, Yi Hu, Hong Yang, Qian-Wen Liu, Kong-Jia Luo, Qing-Yuan Huang, Jun-Ying Chen, Jian-Hua Fu, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the influence of nodal status on response and clarify the optimal treatment for operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1490 OSCC patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy between December 1996 and December 2009 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The surgical approach and the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) were considered in the assessment of surgery. Patients were classified according to their nodal statuses (N0 vs N1 vs N2-3). Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of death or final follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between curves were assessed by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with prognosis. Statistical significance was assumed at a P < 0.05.

resultsWith a median time from surgery to the last censoring date for the entire cohort of 72.2 mo, a total of 631 patients were still alive at the last follow-up and the median survival time was 35.5 mo. The surgical approach (left transthoracic vs Ivor-Lewis/tri-incisional) was verified as independent prognostic significance in patients with N0 or N1 status, but not in those with N2-3 status. Similar results were also observed with the number of resected LNs (≤ 14 vs ≥ 15). Compared with surgery alone, combined therapy achieved better outcomes in patients with N1 or N2-3 status, but not in those with N0 status. For those with N2-3 status, neither the surgical approach nor the number of resected LNs reached significance by univariate analysis, with unadjusted HRs of 0.826 (95%CI: 0.644-1.058) and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.668-1.078), respectively, and aggressiveness of surgery did not influence the outcome; the longest survival was observed in those patients who received the combined therapy.

conclusionCombined therapy has a positive role in OSCC with LN metastasis, and aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in patients with N2-3 status.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantChinaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleEsophageal neoplasmLymph nodesPrognosisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID26229406
PMCPMC4515845
OpenAlexW2416163643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.