Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26229388›Full record

ReviewJournal of international oral health : JIOH2015

Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia: Relevance in Oral Pathology.

R Sarangarajan, V K Vaishnavi Vedam, G Sivadas, R Krishnaraj, Anuradha Sarangarajan, K T Shanmugam

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of international oral health : JIOH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Subgemmal neurogenous plaques of the tongue: a systematic autopsy study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R SarangarajanProfessor, Department of Oral Pathology, Madha Dental College and Hospital, Kundrathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
V K Vaishnavi VedamLecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine Science and Technology University, Malaysia.
G SivadasLecturer, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine Science and Technology, University, Malaysia.
R KrishnarajSenior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anuradha SarangarajanGeneral Dental Practitioner, Sai Raghav Dental Clinic, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
K T ShanmugamReader, Department of Oral Pathology, Madha Dental College & Hospital, Kundrathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
AIMST University · MYRagas Dental College & Hospital · INMNR Dental College and Hospital · INTamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH), a neglected entity by oral pathologist possesses utmost importance in the field of research. Of all the investigative challenges, PEH, a reactive epithelial proliferation is seen secondary to lesions with infectious, inflammatory, reactive, and degenerative origin. Small sized samples, incomplete excision, improper orientation, and dense inflammatory changes render diagnostic confront to the oral pathologist in exclusion of frankly invasive malignant lesions like squamous cell carcinoma from lesions exhibiting PEH. The diagnosis can occasionally be difficult as they mimic other lesions also, on clinic-pathological assessment. Thus, this article gives an insight regarding the various concepts of etiopathogenesis, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and malignant potential of PEH. A combined effort of a clinician and pathologist benefits every patient to rule out malignancy and render appropriate treatment as the only local conservative approach is essential to remove PEH associated lesions.

Indexed as

Keratoacanthomamalignant melanomapseudoepithe liomatous hyperplasiasquamous cell carcinomaverrucous carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID26229388
PMCPMC4513768
OpenAlexW2412228506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.