Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26228741›Full record

ReviewScience and engineering ethics2016

Protecting Ideas: Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant's Principal Investigator Changes.

Leonidas G Koniaris, Mary I Coombs, Eric M Meslin, Teresa A Zimmers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Science and engineering ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonidas G KoniarisDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 45 Barnhill Drive, Emerson 5, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. lkoniari@iu.edu.
Mary I CoombsSchool of Law, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Eric M MeslinIndiana University Center for Bioethics, University of Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Teresa A ZimmersDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 45 Barnhill Drive, Emerson 5, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties' obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution's obligation to recognize the PI's original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchFinancing, OrganizedPlagiarismResearchResearch PersonnelWorkforceAuthorshipGrant awardsGrant stipulationsGrant transfersPI transferPlagiarismPrincipal investigator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.