Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26228683›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015

Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus differentially affect sign- and goal-tracking conditioned responses.

Joshua L Haight, Kurt M Fraser, Huda Akil, Shelly B Flagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Separating desire from prediction of outcome value.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua L HaightNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kurt M FraserUndergraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Huda AkilDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shelly B FlagelNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Can Affective Resilience be Enhanced? A Developmental and Epigenetic ApproachR01MH104261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AKIL, HUDA, WATSON, STANLEY J · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
Dynamic control of cue-driven behavior via the paraventricular thalamic nucleusR01DA038599 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
The Role of the Paraventricular Thalamus in Incentive Salience AttributionF31DA037680 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HAIGHT, JOSHUA LEWIS · 2014 to 2015
$67k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA037680NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038599NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007821NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, evidence has emerged suggesting a role for the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) in the processing of reward-associated cues. However, the specific role of the PVT in these processes has yet to be elucidated. Here we use an animal model that captures individual variation in response to discrete reward-associated cues to further assess the role of the PVT in stimulus-reward learning. When rats are exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm, wherein a discrete cue predicts food reward, two distinct conditioned responses emerge. Some rats, termed sign-trackers, approach and manipulate the cue, whereas others, termed goal-trackers, approach the location of reward delivery upon cue presentation. For both sign- and goal-trackers the cue is a predictor, but only for sign-trackers is it also an incentive stimulus. We investigated the role of the PVT in the acquisition and expression of these conditioned responses using an excitotoxic lesion. Results indicate that PVT lesions prior to acquisition amplify the differences between phenotypes - increasing sign-tracking and attenuating goal-tracking behavior. Lesions of the PVT after rats had acquired their respective conditioned responses also attenuated the expression of the goal-tracking response, and increased the sign-tracking response, but did so selectively in goal-trackers. These results suggest that the PVT acts to suppress the attribution of incentive salience to reward cues, as disruption of the functional activity within this structure enhances the tendency to sign-track.

Indexed as

CuesRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalDisease Models, AnimalMaleMotivationParaventricular Hypothalamic NucleusRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyincentive saliencemotivationparaventricular nucleus of the thalamusPavlovian conditioningrats

Identifiers

PMID26228683
PMCPMC4596770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.