ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Urinary diversion with continent umbilical stoma: Which techniques are suitable for which patients?].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinent cutaneous diversions play a secondary role even in many centers for urinary diversion. The result is that knowledge about, indications and operation technique does not exist in many clinics.
resultsThe general complication rates of the various forms of urinary diversion are not significantly different. There is no quality of life study showing a significant advantage for either form of urinary diversion. The functional results of neobladders in females with up to 70% hypercontinence are worse than in men, resulting in 2.4-fold more continent urinary diversions in men compared to women. The complication rates of the various forms of continent cutaneous pouches are different.
conclusionContinent cutaneous pouches are an option for all patients with non-existing or functionally unusable urethra and as primary indication in all women with bladder cancer, consulting in very good quality of life and perfect body image. Age (<75 years), manual skills and psychological ability are selection criteria. As far as the results and complication rates are concerned the ileocecal pouch with an appendix umbilical stoma is the best option. In cases of non-existing appendix, alternatives are a neoappendix, serosal lined tapered ileum and ileal invagination nipple.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.