Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26228544›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2015

dissectHMMER: a HMMER-based score dissection framework that statistically evaluates fold-critical sequence segments for domain fold similarity.

Wing-Cheong Wong, Choon-Kong Yap, Birgit Eisenhaber, Frank Eisenhaber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Novel SecretedFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wing-Cheong WongBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore. wongwc@bii.a-star.edu.sg.
Choon-Kong YapBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore. yapck@bii.a-star.edu.sg.
Birgit EisenhaberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore. birgite@bii.a-star.edu.sg.
Frank EisenhaberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Singapore. franke@bii.a-star.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnotation transfer for function and structure within the sequence homology concept essentially requires protein sequence similarity for the secondary structural blocks forming the fold of a protein. A simplistic similarity approach in the case of non-globular segments (coiled coils, low complexity regions, transmembrane regions, long loops, etc.) is not justified and a pertinent source for mistaken homologies. The latter is either due to positional sequence conservation as a result of a very simple, physically induced pattern or integral sequence properties that are critical for function. Furthermore, against the backdrop that the number of well-studied proteins continues to grow at a slow rate, it necessitates for a search methodology to dive deeper into the sequence similarity space to connect the unknown sequences to the well-studied ones, albeit more distant, for biological function postulations.

resultsBased on our previous work of dissecting the hidden markov model (HMMER) based similarity score into fold-critical and the non-globular contributions to improve homology inference, we propose a framework-dissectHMMER, that identifies more fold-related domain hits from standard HMMER searches. Subsequent statistical stratification of the fold-related hits into cohorts of functionally-related domains allows for the function postulation of the query sequence. Briefly, the technical problems as to how to recognize non-globular parts in the domain model, resolve contradictory HMMER2/HMMER3 results and evaluate fold-related domain hits for homology, are addressed in this work. The framework is benchmarked against a set of SCOP-to-Pfam domain models. Despite being a sequence-to-profile method, dissectHMMER performs favorably against a profile-to-profile based method-HHsuite/HHsearch. Examples of function annotation using dissectHMMER, including the function discovery of an uncharacterized membrane protein Q9K8K1_BACHD (WP_010899149.1) as a lactose/H+ symporter, are presented. Finally, dissectHMMER webserver is made publicly available at http://dissecthmmer.bii.a-star.edu.sg .

conclusionsThe proposed framework-dissectHMMER, is faithful to the original inception of the sequence homology concept while improving upon the existing HMMER search tool through the rescue of statistically evaluated false-negative yet fold-related domain hits to the query sequence. Overall, this translates into an opportunity for any novel protein sequence to be functionally characterized.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, ProteinComputer SimulationModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationPeptide LibraryProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryPeptide LibraryProteins

Identifiers

PMID26228544
PMCPMC4521371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.