ArticleGenome research2015
The frequent evolutionary birth and death of functional promoters in mouse and human.
Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Core elements play distinct roles in promoter birth and transcriptional regulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Biophysical constraints on mRNA decay rates shape macroevolutionary divergence in steady-state abundances.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Potential and Dispersal Propensity in a Free-Living Songbird: A Spatial and Temporal Approach.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Nidogen-1 suppresses cell proliferation, migration, and glycolysis via integrin β1-mediated HIF-1α downregulation in triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybrid exons evolved by coupling transcription initiation and splicing at the nucleotide level.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- De Novo Genes.Annual review of genetics · 2024Review
- The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.The EMBO journal · 2024Article
- Mutational biases favor complexity increases in protein interaction networks after gene duplication.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- Emergence of enhancers at late DNA replicating regions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Quantification and modeling of turnover dynamics of de novo transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- The fitness cost of spurious phosphorylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Phylogenetic modeling of enhancer shifts in African mole-rats reveals regulatory changes associated with tissue-specific traits.Genome research · 2023Article
- Population genomics reveals mechanisms and dynamics of de novo expressed open reading frame emergence inGenome research · 2023Article
- Comparative three-dimensional genome architectures of adipose tissues provide insight into human-specific regulation of metabolic homeostasis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
- Widespread transposon co-option in theScience advances · 2022Article
- The contribution of evolutionarily volatile promoters to molecular phenotypes and human trait variation.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Endogenous retroviruses co-opted as divergently transcribed regulatory elements shape the regulatory landscape of embryonic stem cells.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- A Chinese hamster transcription start site atlas that enables targeted editing of CHO cells.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Evolution of tissue and developmental specificity of transcription start sites in Bos taurus indicus.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Molecular and evolutionary processes generating variation in gene expression.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Promoters are central to the regulation of gene expression. Changes in gene regulation are thought to underlie much of the adaptive diversification between species and phenotypic variation within populations. In contrast to earlier work emphasizing the importance of enhancer evolution and subtle sequence changes at promoters, we show that dramatic changes such as the complete gain and loss (collectively, turnover) of functional promoters are common. Using quantitative measures of transcription initiation in both humans and mice across 52 matched tissues, we discriminate promoter sequence gains from losses and resolve the lineage of changes. We also identify expression divergence and functional turnover between orthologous promoters, finding only the latter is associated with local sequence changes. Promoter turnover has occurred at the majority (>56%) of protein-coding genes since humans and mice diverged. Tissue-restricted promoters are the most evolutionarily volatile where retrotransposition is an important, but not the sole, source of innovation. There is considerable heterogeneity of turnover rates between promoters in different tissues, but the consistency of these in both lineages suggests that the same biological systems are similarly inclined to transcriptional rewiring. The genes affected by promoter turnover show evidence of adaptive evolution. In mice, promoters are primarily lost through deletion of the promoter containing sequence, whereas in humans, many promoters appear to be gradually decaying with weak transcriptional output and relaxed selective constraint. Our results suggest that promoter gain and loss is an important process in the evolutionary rewiring of gene regulation and may be a significant source of phenotypic diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.