Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26228011›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2015

Using Human Factors and Systems Engineering to Evaluate Readmission after Complex Surgery.

Alexandra W Acher, Tamara J LeCaire, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Caprice C Greenberg, Pascale Carayon, Amy J Kind, Sharon M Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Collaboration Breakdowns Between Provider Teams and Patients in Post-Surgery Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SEIPS 101 and seven simple SEIPS tools.BMJ quality & safety · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Review
  14. Creating a culture of communication in undergraduate medical education.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra W AcherWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
Tamara J LeCaireWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Ann Schoofs HundtCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, Madison, WI.
Caprice C GreenbergWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, Madison, WI; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Pascale CarayonCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, Madison, WI; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Amy J KindDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
Sharon M WeberWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI. Electronic address: webers@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Incorporating the Patient Perspective to Reduce Readmission after Complex SurgeryK18HS022446 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WEBER, SHARON M · 2014 to 2015
$370k
AHRQ HHS K18 HS022446NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427NIBIB NIH HHS L30 EB016082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur objective was to use a human factors and systems engineering approach to understand contributors to surgical readmissions from a patient and provider perspective. Previous studies on readmission have neglected the patient perspective. To address this gap and to better inform intervention design, we evaluated how transitions of care relate to and influence readmission from the patient and clinician perspective using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model. STUDY

designPatients readmitted within 30 days of discharge after complex abdominal surgery were interviewed. A focus group of inpatient clinician providers was conducted. Questions were guided by the SEIPS framework and content was analyzed. Data were collected concurrently from the medical record for a mixed-methods approach.

resultsReadmission occurred a median of 8 days (range 1 to 25 days) after discharge. All patients had follow-up scheduled with their surgeon, but readmission occurred before this in 72% of patients. Primary readmission diagnoses included infection, gastrointestinal complications, and dehydration. Patients (n = 18) and clinician providers (n = 6) identified a number of factors during the transition of care that may have contributed to readmission, including poor patient and caregiver understanding; inadequate discharge preparation for home care; insufficient educational process and materials, negatively affected by electronic health record design; and inadequate care team communication.

conclusionsThis is the first study to use a human factors and systems engineering approach to evaluate the impact of the quality of the transition of care and its influence on readmission from the patient and clinician perspective. Important targets for future interventions include enhancing the discharge process, improving education materials, and increasing care team coordination, with the overarching theme that improved patient and caregiver understanding and engagement are essential to decrease readmission and postdischarge health care use.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26228011
PMCPMC4782927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.