Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26227951›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2015

Identification of anti-tumour biologics using primary tumour models, 3-D phenotypic screening and image-based multi-parametric profiling.

Alan M Sandercock, Steven Rust, Sandrine Guillard, Kris F Sachsenmeier, Nick Holoweckyj, Carl Hay, Matt Flynn, Qihui Huang, Kuan Yan, Bram Herpers and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep Mining of Complex Antibody Phage Pools.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Use of Stem Cell-Derived Organoids in Disease Modeling: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alan M SandercockMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK. sandercocka@medimmune.com.
Steven RustMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK. rusts@medimmune.com.
Sandrine GuillardMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK. guillards@medimmune.com.
Kris F SachsenmeierMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. sachsenmeierk@medimmune.com.
Nick HoloweckyjMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. holoweckyjn@medimmune.com.
Carl HayMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. hayc@medimmune.com.
Matt FlynnMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. flynnm@medimmune.com.
Qihui HuangMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. huangq@MedImmune.com.
Kuan YanOcellO, Leiden BioPartner Center, J. H Oortweg 21, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands. Kuan.yan@OcellO.nl.
Bram HerpersOcellO, Leiden BioPartner Center, J. H Oortweg 21, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands. Bram.herpers@OcellO.nl.
Leo S PriceOcellO, Leiden BioPartner Center, J. H Oortweg 21, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands. Leo.price@OcellO.nl.
Jo SodenRetrogenix, Crown House, Bingswood Estate, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, SK23 7LY, UK. Jo.Soden@retrogenix.com.
Jim FreethRetrogenix, Crown House, Bingswood Estate, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, SK23 7LY, UK. Jim.freeth@retrogenix.com.
Lutz JermutusMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK. jermutusl@medimmune.com.
Robert HollingsworthMedImmune, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20287, USA. hollingsworthr@medimmune.com.
Ralph MinterMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK. minterr@medimmune.com.
Altimmune (United States) · USAdaptimmune (United Kingdom) · GBAimmune Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBTiGenix (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonolayer cultures of immortalised cell lines are a popular screening tool for novel anti-cancer therapeutics, but these methods can be a poor surrogate for disease states, and there is a need for drug screening platforms which are more predictive of clinical outcome. In this study, we describe a phenotypic antibody screen using three-dimensional cultures of primary cells, and image-based multi-parametric profiling in PC-3 cells, to identify anti-cancer biologics against new therapeutic targets.

methodsScFv Antibodies and designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) were isolated using phage display selections against primary non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. The selected molecules were screened for anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity against primary cells grown in three-dimensional culture, and in an ultra-high content screen on a 3-D cultured cell line using multi-parametric profiling to detect treatment-induced phenotypic changes. The targets of molecules of interest were identified using a cell-surface membrane protein array. An anti-CUB domain containing protein 1 (CDCP1) antibody was tested for tumour growth inhibition in a patient-derived xenograft model, generated from a stage-IV non-small cell lung carcinoma, with and without cisplatin.

resultsTwo primary non-small cell lung carcinoma cell models were established for antibody isolation and primary screening in anti-proliferative and apoptosis assays. These assays identified multiple antibodies demonstrating activity in specific culture formats. A subset of the DARPins was profiled in an ultra-high content multi-parametric screen, where 300 morphological features were measured per sample. Machine learning was used to select features to classify treatment responses, then antibodies were characterised based on the phenotypes that they induced. This method co-classified several DARPins that targeted CDCP1 into two sets with different phenotypes. Finally, an anti-CDCP1 antibody significantly enhanced the efficacy of cisplatin in a patient-derived NSCLC xenograft model.

conclusionsPhenotypic profiling using complex 3-D cell cultures steers hit selection towards more relevant in vivo phenotypes, and may shed light on subtle mechanistic variations in drug candidates, enabling data-driven decisions for oncology target validation. CDCP1 was identified as a potential target for cisplatin combination therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiological ProductsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell Surface Display TechniquesCisplatinDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsBiomarkers, TumorCDCP1 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesCisplatinNeoplasm ProteinsPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID26227951
PMCPMC4521473
OpenAlexW2137006231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.