Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26227803›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Invasion Expansion: Time since introduction best predicts global ranges of marine invaders.

James E Byers, Rachel S Smith, James M Pringle, Graeme F Clark, Paul E Gribben, Chad L Hewitt, Graeme J Inglis, Emma L Johnston, Gregory M Ruiz, John J Stachowicz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global indicators of the environmental impacts of invasive alien species and their information adequacy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Exotic asphyxiation: interactions between invasive species and hypoxia.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Genomics-informed models reveal extensive stretches of coastline under threat by an ecologically dominant invasive species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Climate matching drives spread rate but not establishment success in recent unintentional bird introductions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James E ByersOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
Rachel S Smith1] Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA [2] Evolution &Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia.
James M Pringle142 Morse Hall, Ocean Process Analysis Laboratory, 8 College Rd, UNH, Durham NH 03857 USA.
Graeme F ClarkEvolution &Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia.
Paul E GribbenCentre of Marine Bio-innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia.
Chad L HewittSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Graeme J InglisNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 10 Kyle Street, Riccarton, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Emma L JohnstonEvolution &Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia.
Gregory M RuizSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA.
John J StachowiczDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Melanie J BishopDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies for managing biological invasions are often based on the premise that characteristics of invading species and the invaded environment are key predictors of the invader's distribution. Yet, for either biological traits or environmental characteristics to explain distribution, adequate time must have elapsed for species to spread to all potential habitats. We compiled and analyzed a database of natural history and ecological traits of 138 coastal marine invertebrate species, the environmental conditions at sites to which they have been introduced, and their date of first introduction. We found that time since introduction explained the largest fraction (20%) of the variability in non-native range size, while traits of the species and environmental variables had significant, but minimal, influence on non-native range size. The positive relationship between time since introduction and range size indicates that non-native marine invertebrate species are not at equilibrium and are still spreading, posing a major challenge for management of coastal ecosystems.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesInvertebratesAnimalsAquatic OrganismsAustraliaDatabases, FactualEcosystemEnvironmentMarine BiologyNew ZealandShipsTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26227803
PMCPMC4521186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.