Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26227799›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2016

The SWITCH study: rationale and design of the trial.

Stephan Heres, Diana Meliu Cirjaliu, Liana Dehelean, Valentin Petre Matei, Delia Marina Podea, Dorina Sima, Lynne Stecher, Stefan Leucht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan HeresKlinik und Poliklinik fuer Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen, am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. s.heres@lrz.tum.de.
Diana Meliu CirjaliuSpitalul Judetean Constanta, Clinica de Psihiatrie, Palazu Mare, Romania.
Liana Dehelean"Victor Babes" Timisoara University of Medicine and Pharmacy and Clinica de Psihiatrie, Eduard Pamfil, Timisoara, Romania.
Valentin Petre MateiSpitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie Obregia, Bucharest, Romania.
Delia Marina PodeaVasile Goldis Western University of Arad, Romania, and Clinica de Psihiatrie, Arad, Romania.
Dorina SimaSpitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie Obregia, Bucharest, Romania.
Lynne StecherInstitut fuer Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie (IMSE), Technische Universitaet Muenchen am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Stefan LeuchtKlinik und Poliklinik fuer Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen, am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DESpitalul Clinic de Psihiatrie Alexandru Obregia · ROKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DESpitalul Clinic Judetean Mures · ROVasile Goldis Western University of Arad · ROVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many patients do not respond to the first antipsychotic drug prescribed, but require multiple trials with different drugs before response is achieved. Current treatment guidelines vary substantially in their recommendations as to how long clinicians should wait before an antipsychotic treatment attempt should be considered as failed and the compound switched. It has, however, recently been shown that poor early response to an antipsychotic is associated with continuous poor later response in the course of the same treatment attempt. This finding suggests that patients who do experience poor early response might benefit from a switch in antipsychotic medication as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. In the SWITCH trial, 350 patients suffering from an acute episode of schizophrenia are randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either olanzapine or amisulpride. The primary endpoint is symptomatic remission at week 8. Patients not experiencing at least minor response after 2 weeks are randomized again to either staying on the initially assigned drug or being switched to the alternative compound for another 6 weeks. In case early switching proves superior to maintaining treatment, time wasted for unsuccessful treatment attempts could be minimized, patients' outcomes improved, duration of hospital stays reduced, and thus overall treatment expenses saved. The current report will present the methods of the trial, focusing on various specific features which could be adopted by future studies.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersSample SizeSchizophreniaYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychoticResponseResponse predictionSwitchTreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID26227799
OpenAlexW1005105554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.