Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26227578›Full record

ReviewPatient education and counseling2015

Tools to measure health literacy among Spanish speakers: An integrative review of the literature.

Samantha Stonbraker, Rebecca Schnall, Elaine Larson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient education and counseling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha StonbrakerColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: Slb2201@Cumc.Columbia.edu.
Rebecca SchnallColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: Rb897@Cumc.Columbia.edu.
Elaine LarsonColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA; Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: Ell23@Cumc.Columbia.edu.

Funding

Training in Interdisciplinary Research to Prevent Infections (TIRI)T32NR013454 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LARSON, ELAINE LUCILLE, SAIMAN, LISA · 2012 to 2017
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealth literacy measurement can help inform healthcare service delivery. The objective of this study is to identify validated tools to measure health literacy among Spanish speakers and to summarize characteristics that are relevant when selecting tools for use in clinical or research settings.

methodsAn English and Spanish search of 9 databases was conducted between October 2014 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles presenting initial validation and psychometric properties of a tool to measure health literacy among Spanish speaking patients. Characteristics relevant to tool selection were reviewed and presented.

resultsTwenty articles validating 19 instruments met inclusion criteria. Instruments were designed for use with Spanish speakers in numerous contexts and measured different health literacy skills such as reading comprehension or numeracy. Methods used to validate tools were inconsistent across instruments.

conclusionAlthough tools have inconsistencies and inefficiencies, many can be used for assessment of health literacy among Spanish speakers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers, organizations, and researchers can use this review to select effective health literacy tools to indicate patient's ability to understand and use health information so that services and materials can be more appropriately tailored to Spanish speaking patients.

Indexed as

AssessmentHealth literacyInstrumentIntegrative reviewMeasurementSpanishTool

Identifiers

PMID26227578
PMCPMC4721943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.