Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26227167›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2015

A toolbox for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Eloy Roura, Arnau Oliver, Mariano Cabezas, Sergi Valverde, Deborah Pareto, Joan C Vilanova, Lluís Ramió-Torrentà, Àlex Rovira, Xavier Lladó

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FLAIRNeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Segmentation Using Attention-Based CNNs in FLAIR Images.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Arterial elasticity, endothelial function and intracranial vascular health: A multimodal MRI study.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eloy RouraComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, Ed. P-IV, 17071, Girona, Spain. eloyroura@eia.udg.edu.
Arnau OliverComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, Ed. P-IV, 17071, Girona, Spain.
Mariano CabezasMagnetic Resonance Unit, Dept. of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergi ValverdeComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, Ed. P-IV, 17071, Girona, Spain.
Deborah ParetoMagnetic Resonance Unit, Dept. of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan C VilanovaGirona Magnetic Resonance Center, Girona, Spain.
Lluís Ramió-TorrentàMultiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Unit, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona, Girona, Spain.
Àlex RoviraMagnetic Resonance Unit, Dept. of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier LladóComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, Ed. P-IV, 17071, Girona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLesion segmentation plays an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis (MS). This task is very time-consuming and subject to intra- and inter-rater variability. In this paper, we present a new tool for automated MS lesion segmentation using T1w and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images.

methodsOur approach is based on two main steps, initial brain tissue segmentation according to the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) performed in T1w images, followed by a second step where the lesions are segmented as outliers to the normal apparent GM brain tissue on the FLAIR image.

resultsThe tool has been validated using data from more than 100 MS patients acquired with different scanners and at different magnetic field strengths. Quantitative evaluation provided a better performance in terms of precision while maintaining similar results on sensitivity and Dice similarity measures compared with those of other approaches.

conclusionOur tool is implemented as a publicly available SPM8/12 extension that can be used by both the medical and research communities.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware ValidationAutomated toolLesion detectionLesion segmentationMagnetic resonance imagesMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.