Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226294›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2015

Prognostic Implication of Persistent Human Papillomavirus Type 16 DNA Detection in Oral Rinses for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Eleni M Rettig, Alicia Wentz, Marshall R Posner, Neil D Gross, Robert I Haddad, Maura L Gillison, Carole Fakhry, Harry Quon, Andrew G Sikora, William J Stott and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Salivary biomarkers: a promising approach for predicting immunotherapy response in head and neck cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  6. A Prospective Trial of Biomarker-Guided Surveillance for HPV-Positive Oropharynx Cancer Using Plasma Tumor Tissue-Modified Viral HPV DNA.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Oncogenic Oral Human Papillomavirus Clearance Patterns over 10 Years.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Eleni M RettigDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alicia WentzDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marshall R PosnerTisch Cancer Institute, Head and Neck Oncology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Neil D GrossDivision of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Robert I HaddadDepartment of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maura L GillisonViral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Carole FakhryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland2Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Harry QuonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Andrew G SikoraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
William J StottDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jochen H LorchDepartment of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine G GourinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yingshi GuoViral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Weihong XiaoViral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Brett A MilesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jeremy D RichmonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter E AndersenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Krzysztof J MisiukiewiczTisch Cancer Institute, Head and Neck Oncology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Christine H ChungDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland11Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer E GerberDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shirani D RajanLouisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.
Gypsyamber D'SouzaDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USThe Ohio State University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESOR GENE PROMOTER HYPERMETHYLATION FOR DETECTION OF HEAD AND NECKP50DE019032 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 2007 to 2016
$27.1M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN OTOLARYNGOLOGYT32DC000027 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAREY, JOHN PATRICK · 1989 to 2023
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS 2T32DC000027-26NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000027NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE019032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceHuman papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV-OPC) is increasing in incidence in the United States. Although HPV-OPC has favorable prognosis, 10% to 25% of HPV-OPCs recur. Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in oral rinses is associated with HPV-OPC, but its potential as a prognostic biomarker is unclear.

objectiveTo determine whether HPV DNA detection in oral rinses after treatment for HPV-OPC is associated with recurrence and survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsProspective cohort study of patients with incident HPV-OPC diagnosed from 2009 to 2013 at 4 academic tertiary referral cancer centers in the United States. Oral rinse samples were collected at diagnosis and after treatment (9, 12, 18, and 24 months after diagnosis), and evaluated for HPV DNA. Among an initial cohort of 157 participants with incident HPV-OPC treated with curative intent, 124 had 1 or more posttreatment oral rinses available and were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the association of HPV DNA detection in oral rinses with survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

resultsOral HPV type 16 (HPV16) DNA was common at diagnosis (67 of 124 participants [54%]). In contrast, oral HPV16 DNA was detected in only 6 participants after treatment (5%), including 5 with HPV16 DNA also detected at diagnosis (persistent oral HPV16 DNA). Two-year DFS and OS were 92% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and 98% (95% CI, 93%-99%). Persistent oral HPV16 DNA was associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio, 29.7 [95% CI, 9.0-98.2]) and OS (hazard ratio, 23.5 [95% CI, 4.7-116.9]). All 5 participants with persistent oral HPV16 DNA developed recurrent disease, 3 with local disease involvement. In contrast, just 9 of 119 participants (8%) without persistent oral HPV16 DNA developed recurrent disease, only 1 (11%) with local disease involvement. Median (range) time from earliest posttreatment oral HPV16 DNA detection to recurrence was 7.0 (3.7-10.9) months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in oral rinses is common at diagnosis but rare after treatment for HPV-OPC. Our data suggest that, although infrequent, persistent HPV16 DNA in posttreatment oral rinses is associated with poor prognosis and is a potential tool for long-term tumor surveillance, perhaps more so for local recurrence.

Indexed as

Human Papillomavirus DNA TestsCarcinomaDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDNA, ViralHuman papillomavirus 16HumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMouthNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsPredictive Value of TestsDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID26226294
PMCPMC7286348
OpenAlexW2137594721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.