Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226250›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Intentional Medication Nonadherence Because of Interactive Toxicity Beliefs Among HIV-Positive Active Drug Users.

Seth C Kalichman, Moira O Kalichman, Charsey Cherry, Ginger Hoyt, Christopher Washington, Tamar Grebler, Brandi Welles, Cindy Merely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seth C KalichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut.
Moira O Kalichman
Charsey Cherry
Ginger Hoyt
Christopher Washington
Tamar Grebler
Brandi Welles
Cindy Merely
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Behavioral Intervention to Enhance HIV Test/TreatR01DA033067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Nurse Delivered Cell-Phone HIV Adherence InterventionR01NR012962 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Influence of Food Insecurity on AdherenceR01AA021471 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2013 to 2015
$941k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021471NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA021471NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033067NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA033067NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012962NINR NIH HHS R01NR012962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug use poses significant challenges to medical management of HIV infection. Although most research has focused on the influence of intoxication on unintentional adherence to HIV treatment, drug use may also lead to intentional nonadherence, particularly when individuals believe that mixing medications with drugs is harmful. This study examined whether interactive toxicity beliefs predict nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) over a prospective period of adherence monitoring.

methodsMen and women living with HIV who screened positive for drug use and were being treated with ART (n = 530) completed computerized self-interviews and 3 prospective unannounced pill counts to measure ART adherence and provided urine specimens for drug screening and HIV viral load results from medical records.

resultsResults showed that 189 (35%) participants indicated that they intentionally miss their ART when they are using drugs. These participants also reported common beliefs regarding the perceived hazards of mixing HIV medications with alcohol and other drugs. Multivariable models controlled for demographic and health characteristics and frequency of alcohol use showed that intentional nonadherence predicted poorer ART adherence over the prospective month and also predicted poorer treatment outcomes as indexed by unsuppressed HIV viral load.

conclusionsThese findings extend previous research to show that interactive toxicity beliefs and intentional nonadherence play a significant role in medication nonadherence for a substantial number of people living with HIV and should be actively addressed in HIV clinical care.

Indexed as

Drug UsersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication AdherenceAdultAlcoholismAnti-HIV AgentsCocaineDronabinolDrug InteractionsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIllicit DrugsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedAnti-HIV AgentsCocaineDronabinolIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26226250
PMCPMC4648658
OpenAlexW2466267857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.