SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015
Tranexamic acid and blood loss during and after cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Study For Role Of Different Prophylactic Doses Of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid In Reducing Blood Loss At Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Tranexamic Acid Versus Novel Uterine Cooling Technique in Reducing Blood Loss and Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Caesarean Section
Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage With Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Obstetrical Hemorrhage After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A Novel Technique Of Uterine Cooling During Repeated Cesarean Section For Reducing Blood Loss
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of tranexamic acid application in gynecology and obstetrics procedures: a umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomized trials.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Pooled it
- Local Tranexamic Acid Infiltration for Prophylactic Hemorrhage Control in Vaginal Hysterectomy: Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2026Trial
- Prophylactic tranexamic acid for reducing intraoperative blood loss during cesarean section in women at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage: A double-blind placebo randomized controlled trial.Women's health (London, England)Trial
- Article
- Tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2019Article
- Tranexamic acid for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding and hyperfibrinolysis.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2017Review
- Role of Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss during Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate whether tranexamic acid (TXA) could significantly reduce blood loss during and after cesarean section (CS) when compared with no TXA. STUDY
designMEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science were searched to identify RCTs that compared intravenous TXA with no TXA before CS for blood loss. The related data were extracted by two independent authors. The fixed or random-effect methods were used to combine data.
resultEleven RCTs were included in this analysis with a total of 1276 women in TXA group and 1255 in no TXA (control) group. Total blood loss during and after CS was significantly less in TXA group than in control group (mean difference (MD) -141.61 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) -207.09 to -76.14, P<0.01). There was a significant reduction in intraoperative and postpartum blood loss in TXA group as compared with control group (MD -143.36 ml, 95% CI -220.38 to -66.35, P<0.01; and MD -38.20 ml, 95% CI -59.27 to -17.12, P<0.01, respectively). Declines in hemoglobin and hematocrit values after CS were both significantly less in TXA group than in control group. The difference of postpartum hemorrhage rate was statistically significant between groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.89, P=0.01). The need for blood transfusion was significantly less in TXA group than control group (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.57, P<0.01).
conclusionOur results demonstrate that TXA offers an advantage over no TXA in reducing blood loss during and after CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.