Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226146›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Highest Resolution In Vivo Human Brain MRI Using Prospective Motion Correction.

Daniel Stucht, K Appu Danishad, Peter Schulze, Frank Godenschweger, Maxim Zaitsev, Oliver Speck

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nanoscopic Mapping of the Extracellular Space in Amyloid Plaque-rich Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. High-resolution 0.16-mm time-of-flight angiography at 7 T with volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction.Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine ... Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Image-based hemodynamic simulations for intracranial aneurysms: the impact of complex vasculature.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Comment on
    T2017
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel StuchtBiomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Institute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
K Appu DanishadBiomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter SchulzeBiomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), site Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank GodenschwegerBiomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maxim ZaitsevDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver SpeckBiomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), site Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

RGR-based motion tracking for real-time adaptive MR imaging and spectroscopyR01DA021146 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ERNST, THOMAS M · 2007 to 2018
$8.6M
NIDA NIH HHS 2R01 DA021146NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High field MRI systems, such as 7 Tesla (T) scanners, can deliver higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) than lower field scanners and thus allow for the acquisition of data with higher spatial resolution, which is often demanded by users in the fields of clinical and neuroscientific imaging. However, high resolution scans may require long acquisition times, which in turn increase the discomfort for the subject and the risk of subject motion. Even with a cooperative and trained subject, involuntary motion due to heartbeat, swallowing, respiration and changes in muscle tone can cause image artifacts that reduce the effective resolution. In addition, scanning with higher resolution leads to increased sensitivity to even very small movements. Prospective motion correction (PMC) at 3T and 7T has proven to increase image quality in case of subject motion. Although the application of prospective motion correction is becoming more popular, previous articles focused on proof of concept studies and technical descriptions, whereas this paper briefly describes the technical aspects of the optical tracking system, marker fixation and cross calibration and focuses on the application of PMC to very high resolution imaging without intentional motion. In this study we acquired in vivo MR images at 7T using prospective motion correction during long acquisitions. As a result, we present images among the highest, if not the highest resolution of in vivo human brain MRI ever acquired.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainCalibrationEquipment DesignHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionMovementProspective StudiesRespiration

Identifiers

PMID26226146
PMCPMC4520483
OpenAlexW1887492080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.