Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226007›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2015

The Internet Process Addiction Test: Screening for Addictions to Processes Facilitated by the Internet.

Jason C Northrup, Coady Lapierre, Jeffrey Kirk, Cosette Rae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Internet Addiction and Sleep Problems among Russian Adolescents: A Field School-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Observational
  4. Compulsive Internet and Prevalence Substance Use among Spanish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason C NorthrupDepartment of Counseling and Human Services, St. Mary's University, One Camino Santa Maria, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA. jnorthrup1@stmarytx.edu.
Coady LapierreDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, Texas A&M University-Central Texas, 1001 Leadership Place, Killeen, TX 76549, USA. lapierre@tamuct.edu.
Jeffrey KirkDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, Texas A&M University-Central Texas, 1001 Leadership Place, Killeen, TX 76549, USA. jeff.kirk@tamuct.edu.
Cosette RaeSTART, 16307 NE 83rd Street Suite #208, Redmond, WA 98052, USA. cosette.rae@restartlife.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet Process Addiction Test (IPAT) was created to screen for potential addictive behaviors that could be facilitated by the internet. The IPAT was created with the mindset that the term "Internet addiction" is structurally problematic, as the Internet is simply the medium that one uses to access various addictive processes. The role of the internet in facilitating addictions, however, cannot be minimized. A new screening tool that effectively directed researchers and clinicians to the specific processes facilitated by the internet would therefore be useful. This study shows that the Internet Process Addiction Test (IPAT) demonstrates good validity and reliability. Four addictive processes were effectively screened for with the IPAT: Online video game playing, online social networking, online sexual activity, and web surfing. Implications for further research and limitations of the study are discussed.

Indexed as

internet addictioninternet process addictiononline sexual activityonline social networkingonline video gamesproblematic internet use

Identifiers

PMID26226007
PMCPMC4600140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.