Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26226004›Full record

ReviewGenes2015

Contribution of Topological Domains and Loop Formation to 3D Chromatin Organization.

Vuthy Ea, Marie-Odile Baudement, Annick Lesne, Thierry Forné

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Identifying clusters ofGenome research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vuthy EaInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, UMR5535, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. vuthy.ea@igmm.cnrs.fr.
Marie-Odile BaudementInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, UMR5535, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. mbaudement@igmm.cnrs.fr.
Annick LesneInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, UMR5535, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. annick.lesne@lptmc.jussieu.fr.
Thierry FornéInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, UMR5535, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. thierry.forne@igmm.cnrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent investigations on 3D chromatin folding revealed that the eukaryote genomes are both highly compartmentalized and extremely dynamic. This review presents the most recent advances in topological domains' organization of the eukaryote genomes and discusses the relationship to chromatin loop formation. CTCF protein appears as a central factor of these two organization levels having either a strong insulating role at TAD borders, or a weaker architectural role in chromatin loop formation. TAD borders directly impact on chromatin dynamics by restricting contacts within specific genomic portions thus confining chromatin loop formation within TADs. We discuss how sub-TAD chromatin dynamics, constrained into a recently described statistical helix conformation, can produce functional interactions by contact stabilization.

Indexed as

chromatin dynamicschromatin loopsCTCFstatistical helixTAD borderstopological domains

Identifiers

PMID26226004
PMCPMC4584327
OpenAlexW1590857219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.