Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225866›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2015

Inferring Pairwise Interactions from Biological Data Using Maximum-Entropy Probability Models.

Richard R Stein, Debora S Marks, Chris Sander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Forecasting drug resistant HIV protease evolution.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inference and visualization of complex genotype-phenotype maps withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gauge fixing for sequence-function relationships.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gauge fixing for sequence-function relationships.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard R SteinComputational Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Debora S MarksDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Chris SanderComputational Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
Accelerated Determination of 3D Structures of Proteins and ComplexesR01GM106303 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximum entropy-based inference methods have been successfully used to infer direct interactions from biological datasets such as gene expression data or sequence ensembles. Here, we review undirected pairwise maximum-entropy probability models in two categories of data types, those with continuous and categorical random variables. As a concrete example, we present recently developed inference methods from the field of protein contact prediction and show that a basic set of assumptions leads to similar solution strategies for inferring the model parameters in both variable types. These parameters reflect interactive couplings between observables, which can be used to predict global properties of the biological system. Such methods are applicable to the important problems of protein 3-D structure prediction and association of gene-gene networks, and they enable potential applications to the analysis of gene alteration patterns and to protein design.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, ChemicalModels, StatisticalAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesComputer SimulationEntropyMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID26225866
PMCPMC4520494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.