Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225807›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2016

Respiratory source control using a surgical mask: An in vitro study.

Rajeev B Patel, Shaji D Skaria, Mohamed M Mansour, Gerald C Smaldone

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Constant vs. cyclic flow when testing face masks and respirators as source control devices for simulated respiratory aerosols.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Cross-Sectional, Questionnaire-Based Survey on Air Infection Control among Romanian People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Understanding the coevolution of mask wearing and epidemics: A network perspective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Respiratory droplets interception in fibrous porous media.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. A comparison of performance metrics for cloth masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2021
    Article
  18. Effect of COVID-19 on hospital visits in Ningbo, China: an interrupted time-series analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajeev B Patela Stony Brook University Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine , Stony Brook , New York.
Shaji D Skariaa Stony Brook University Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine , Stony Brook , New York.
Mohamed M Mansoura Stony Brook University Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine , Stony Brook , New York.
Gerald C Smaldonea Stony Brook University Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine , Stony Brook , New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cough etiquette and respiratory hygiene are forms of source control encouraged to prevent the spread of respiratory infection. The use of surgical masks as a means of source control has not been quantified in terms of reducing exposure to others. We designed an in vitro model using various facepieces to assess their contribution to exposure reduction when worn at the infectious source (Source) relative to facepieces worn for primary (Receiver) protection, and the factors that contribute to each. In a chamber with various airflows, radiolabeled aerosols were exhaled via a ventilated soft-face manikin head using tidal breathing and cough (Source). Another manikin, containing a filter, quantified recipient exposure (Receiver). The natural fit surgical mask, fitted (SecureFit) surgical mask and an N95-class filtering facepiece respirator (commonly known as an "N95 respirator") with and without a Vaseline-seal were tested. With cough, source control (mask or respirator on Source) was statistically superior to mask or unsealed respirator protection on the Receiver (Receiver protection) in all environments. To equal source control during coughing, the N95 respirator must be Vaseline-sealed. During tidal breathing, source control was comparable or superior to mask or respirator protection on the Receiver. Source control via surgical masks may be an important adjunct defense against the spread of respiratory infections. The fit of the mask or respirator, in combination with the airflow patterns in a given setting, are significant contributors to source control efficacy. Future clinical trials should include a surgical mask source control arm to assess the contribution of source control in overall protection against airborne infection.

Indexed as

MasksRespiratory Protective DevicesAerosolsCoughInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalInhalation ExposureManikinsOccupational ExposureRespirationAerosolsAerosolenvironmental controlsrespiratorsurgical mask

Identifiers

PMID26225807
PMCPMC4873718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.