Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225760›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Phylogeny and Evolutionary Timescale of Muscoidea (Diptera: Brachycera: Calyptratae) Inferred from Mitochondrial Genomes.

Shuangmei Ding, Xuankun Li, Ning Wang, Stephen L Cameron, Meng Mao, Yuyu Wang, Yuqiang Xi, Ding Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parasitoids ofZooKeys · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification ofZooKeys · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The complete mitochondrial genome of the parasitic sheep kedMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuangmei DingDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xuankun LiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ning WangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Stephen L CameronEarth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Science & Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Meng MaoCentre for Medical Bioscience, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Yuyu WangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yuqiang XiDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ding YangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CNQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscoidea is a significant dipteran clade that includes house flies (Family Muscidae), latrine flies (F. Fannidae), dung flies (F. Scathophagidae) and root maggot flies (F. Anthomyiidae). It is comprised of approximately 7000 described species. The monophyly of the Muscoidea and the precise relationships of muscoids to the closest superfamily the Oestroidea (blow flies, flesh flies etc) are both unresolved. Until now mitochondrial (mt) genomes were available for only two of the four muscoid families precluding a thorough test of phylogenetic relationships using this data source. Here we present the first two mt genomes for the families Fanniidae (Euryomma sp.) (family Fanniidae) and Anthomyiidae (Delia platura (Meigen, 1826)). We also conducted phylogenetic analyses containing of these newly sequenced mt genomes plus 15 other species representative of dipteran diversity to address the internal relationship of Muscoidea and its systematic position. Both maximum-likelihood and Bayesian analyses suggested that Muscoidea was not a monophyletic group with the relationship: (Fanniidae + Muscidae) + ((Anthomyiidae + Scathophagidae) + (Calliphoridae + Sarcophagidae)), supported by the majority of analysed datasets. This also infers that Oestroidea was paraphyletic in the majority of analyses. Divergence time estimation suggested that the earliest split within the Calyptratae, separating (Tachinidae + Oestridae) from the remaining families, occurred in the Early Eocene. The main divergence within the paraphyletic muscoidea grade was between Fanniidae + Muscidae and the lineage ((Anthomyiidae + Scathophagidae) + (Calliphoridae + Sarcophagidae)) which occurred in the Late Eocene.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, MitochondrialPhylogenyAnimalsDipteraNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID26225760
PMCPMC4520480
OpenAlexW2126855138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.