Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225753›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2015

Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse: Scotland versus the rest of the UK.

John Frank, Catherine Bromley, Larry Doi, Michelle Estrade, Ruth Jepson, John McAteer, Tony Robertson, Morag Treanor, Andrew Williams

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The bio-psycho-social determinants of health: Reflections on the CIAR Population Health Program (1987-2003).Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. At-a-glance - Bringing equity into the fold: a review of interventions to improve mental health.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John FrankScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK. Electronic address: john.frank@ed.ac.uk.
Catherine BromleyScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
Larry DoiScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
Michelle EstradeScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
John McAteerScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
Tony RobertsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.
Morag TreanorSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK.
Andrew WilliamsScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K007017/1Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While widespread lip service is given in the UK to the social determinants of health (SDoH), there are few published comparisons of how the UK's devolved jurisdictions 'stack up', in terms of implementing SDoH-based policies and programmes, to improve health equity over the life-course. Based on recent SDoH publications, seven key societal-level investments are suggested, across the life-course, for increasing health equity by socioeconomic position (SEP). We present hard-to-find comparable analyses of routinely collected data to gauge the relative extent to which these investments have been pursued and achieved expected goals in Scotland, as compared with England and Wales, in recent decades. Despite Scotland's longstanding explicit goal of reducing health inequalities, it has recently been doing slightly better than England and Wales on only one broad indicator of health-equity-related investments: childhood poverty. However, on the following indicators of other 'best investments for health equity', Scotland has not achieved demonstrably more equitable outcomes by SEP than the rest of the UK: infant mortality and teenage pregnancy rates; early childhood education implementation; standardised educational attainment after primary/secondary school; health care system access and performance; protection of the population from potentially hazardous patterns of food, drink and gambling use; unemployment. Although Scotland did not choose independence on September 18th, 2014, it could still (under the planned increased devolution of powers from Westminster) choose to increase investments in the underperforming categories of interventions for health equity listed above. However, such discussion is largely absent from the current post-referendum debate. Without further significant investments in such policies and programmes, Scotland is unlikely to achieve the 'healthier, fairer society' referred to in the current Scottish Government's official aspirations for the nation.

Indexed as

AdolescentEnglandFemaleHealth EquityHealth PolicyHumansInfantInfant MortalityPovertyPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceScotlandSocial ClassState MedicineWalesEngland and WalesLifecourse epidemiologyPolicies to reduce health inequalitiesPublic healthScotlandUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26225753
PMCPMC4539344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.