Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225556›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Effects of Residue Management on Decomposition in Irrigated Rice Fields Are Not Related to Changes in the Decomposer Community.

Anja Schmidt, Katharina John, Gertrudo Arida, Harald Auge, Roland Brandl, Finbarr G Horgan, Stefan Hotes, Leonardo Marquez, Nico Radermacher, Josef Settele and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anja SchmidtDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Katharina JohnDepartment of Animal Ecology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Gertrudo AridaCrop Protection Division, Philippine Rice Research Institute, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
Harald AugeDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle/Saale, Germany; iDiv-German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Roland BrandlDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Finbarr G HorganInternational Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Stefan HotesDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Leonardo MarquezCrop Protection Division, Philippine Rice Research Institute, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
Nico RadermacherJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Josef SetteleDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle/Saale, Germany; iDiv-German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Volkmar WoltersDepartment of Animal Ecology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Martin SchädlerDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle/Saale, Germany; iDiv-German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decomposers provide an essential ecosystem service that contributes to sustainable production in rice ecosystems by driving the release of nutrients from organic crop residues. During a single rice crop cycle we examined the effects of four different crop residue management practices (rice straw or ash of burned straw scattered on the soil surface or incorporated into the soil) on rice straw decomposition and on the abundance of aquatic and soil-dwelling invertebrates. Mass loss of rice straw in litterbags of two different mesh sizes that either prevented or allowed access of meso- and macro-invertebrates was used as a proxy for decomposition rates. Invertebrates significantly increased total loss of litter mass by up to 30%. Initially, the contribution of invertebrates to decomposition was significantly smaller in plots with rice straw scattered on the soil surface; however, this effect disappeared later in the season. We found no significant responses in microbial decomposition rates to management practices. The abundance of aquatic fauna was higher in fields with rice straw amendment, whereas the abundance of soil fauna fluctuated considerably. There was a clear separation between the overall invertebrate community structure in response to the ash and straw treatments. However, we found no correlation between litter mass loss and abundances of various lineages of invertebrates. Our results indicate that invertebrates can contribute to soil fertility in irrigated paddy fields by decomposing rice straw, and that their abundance as well as efficiency in decomposition may be promoted by crop residue management practices.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationBiodegradation, EnvironmentalAnimalsInvertebratesOryza

Identifiers

PMID26225556
PMCPMC4520592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.