Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225450›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2015

AlphaSpace: Fragment-Centric Topographical Mapping To Target Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces.

David Rooklin, Cheng Wang, Joseph Katigbak, Paramjit S Arora, Yingkai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diffusion Models in De Novo Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David RooklinDepartment of Chemistry, New York University , New York, New York 10003, United States.
Cheng WangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University , New York, New York 10003, United States.
Joseph KatigbakDepartment of Chemistry, New York University , New York, New York 10003, United States.
Paramjit S AroraDepartment of Chemistry, New York University , New York, New York 10003, United States.
Yingkai ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University , New York, New York 10003, United States.
New York University · USNew York University Shanghai · CN

Funding

Biomolecular Recognition with Artificial Alpha-HelicesR01GM073943 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ARORA, PARAMJIT S · 2005 to 2018
$4.4M
Computational Studies of Histone ModificationsR01GM079223 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, YINGKAI · 2007 to 2016
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073943NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM073943NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079223NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM079223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy despite the difficulty in targeting such interfaces with drug-like small molecules. PPIs generally feature large and flat binding surfaces as compared to typical drug targets. These features pose a challenge for structural characterization of the surface using geometry-based pocket-detection methods. An attractive mapping strategy--that builds on the principles of fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD)--is to detect the fragment-centric modularity at the protein surface and then characterize the large PPI interface as a set of localized, fragment-targetable interaction regions. Here, we introduce AlphaSpace, a computational analysis tool designed for fragment-centric topographical mapping (FCTM) of PPI interfaces. Our approach uses the alpha sphere construct, a geometric feature of a protein's Voronoi diagram, to map out concave interaction space at the protein surface. We introduce two new features--alpha-atom and alpha-space--and the concept of the alpha-atom/alpha-space pair to rank pockets for fragment-targetability and to facilitate the evaluation of pocket/fragment complementarity. The resulting high-resolution interfacial map of targetable pocket space can be used to guide the rational design and optimization of small molecule or biomimetic PPI inhibitors.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDatabases, ProteinDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53LigandsProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26225450
PMCPMC4550072
OpenAlexW2403767926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.