Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26225162›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada

Canadian guidelines for the management of small renal masses (SRM).

Michael A S Jewett, Ricardo Rendon, Louis Lacombe, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Simon Tanguay, Wassim Kassouf, Mike Leveridge, Ilias Cagiannos, Anil Kapoor, Stephen Pautler and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment on active surveillance of small renal masses: Progression vs. preference.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. The impact of a multidisciplinary small renal mass clinic on patient treatment decisions.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  9. Optimizing the management of patients with small renal masses in a Canadian context: A Markov decision-analysis model.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  10. Natural history of untreated kidney cancer.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comprehensive assessment of the morbidity of renal mass biopsy: A population-based assessment of biopsy-related complications.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  14. Shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses: Development and acceptability testing of a novel patient decision aid.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  15. Surveillance post-radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses: Recurrence and followup.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  16. Identification of tumor size as the only factor associated with nondiagnostic biopsies in patients with small renal masses.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  17. Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC) consensus statement on the role of renal mass biopsy in the management of kidney cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019
    Article
  18. Growth rates and outcomes of observed large renal masses.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael A S JewettDepartments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON;
Ricardo RendonDepartment of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS;
Louis LacombeDivision of Urology, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC;
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC;
Simon TanguayDivision of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON;
Wassim KassoufDivision of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON;
Mike LeveridgeDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON;
Ilias CagiannosDivision of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON;
Anil KapoorDivision of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON;
Stephen PautlerDivision of Urology, Western University, London, ON;
Darrel DrachtenbergDivision of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB;
Ronald MooreDivision of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB;
Martin GleaveDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC;
Andrew EvansDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON;
Massoom HaiderDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Antonio FinelliDepartments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID26225162
PMCPMC4479634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.